@PugSlugger “Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as communistic by its opponents in power? Where is the opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of communism, against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary adversaries?”

@tim ooof,,hey man,watch out,that one hurt. Careful next time

Said a bit more than that

You know who else wasn’t wrong

Stop huffing your own farts you fucking autist

Fascist infiltrator confirmed

Bootlickers will not survive in our stateless utopia

You didn’t argue anything, the thought that you won only proves your arrogance

Since when were you right?

Your ignorance and arrogance knows no bounds?

It’s already been proven, there is no need

Look back at your previous messages

Done

Really bad at what?

One must confront one with a functional brain in order to make that claim

Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.

“Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil.” Plato

*snap*

This is going into my cringe compilation

<:troll_king:312064227542040576> <:troll_king:312064227542040576> <:troll_king:312064227542040576> <:troll_king:312064227542040576> <:troll_king:312064227542040576>

Another commie destroyed.

<:troll:312064734113431553>

<:troll_king:312064227542040576> <:troll:312064734113431553>

<:troll:312064734113431553> <:troll_king:312064227542040576>

@BetterRedThanDead https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism

https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/conditions/narcissistic-personality-disorder

You seriously think you deserve an argument?

A spectre is haunting Europe — the spectre of communism. All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and Tsar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and German police-spies.

Aw thanks love you too @BetterRedThanDead

Ok but seriously, we're not dumb enough to bite your bait

Try somewhere else

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance @BetterRedThanDead

Have a read of this

Then consider revising your "statement" or whatever you want to prove

>It says something is true because it has not yet been proved false. Or, that something is false if it has not yet been proved true

@BetterRedThanDead So after you have done that, state your premises and conclusion, then we may consider you actually worthy of an argument