Message from @Scale_e

Discord ID: 661009919159566336


2019-12-30 00:56:02 UTC  

he should quite honestly hurl himself off a roof

2019-12-30 00:56:17 UTC  

It's like reading the color of a crayon; reddish-orange is orange with some red in it. A democratic republic is a republic with some democratic qualities. Whatever comes first is an add on

2019-12-30 00:56:26 UTC  

Direct democracy is like asking a bunch of 5 year old what they want for dinner.
They’re going to choose candy for every meal, rot their teeth and become fat.

2019-12-30 00:56:33 UTC  

Andrew don’t like dictatorship but he sure as well wouldn’t mind being in charge of said dictatorship lol

2019-12-30 00:56:37 UTC  

Exactly Scale

2019-12-30 00:56:41 UTC  

i don't even know why people make the tyranny of majority argument for the ec, that's not even the reason why it behaves in the way it does, the purpose - at least in that regard - is to represent each state as a semi-independent entity within the union

2019-12-30 00:56:47 UTC  

hello children

2019-12-30 00:56:51 UTC  

I agree with direct democracy for big constitutional changes, but day to day representational is fine

2019-12-30 00:56:51 UTC  

I'm not much of a leader

2019-12-30 00:56:52 UTC  

democracy only semi works with heavily decentralized government

2019-12-30 00:56:56 UTC  

Especially regional representation

2019-12-30 00:56:57 UTC  

but that doesnt tend to happen

2019-12-30 00:57:02 UTC  

And I despise dictatorships

2019-12-30 00:57:02 UTC  

i can't understand why someone would think population density should affect the weight of votes

2019-12-30 00:57:09 UTC  
2019-12-30 00:57:09 UTC  
2019-12-30 00:57:12 UTC  

Funny how minority rule has caused the vast majority of problems in the world but let's ignore that fact.

2019-12-30 00:57:15 UTC  

direct democracy is anti regional

2019-12-30 00:57:16 UTC  
2019-12-30 00:57:22 UTC  

so big constitutional changes cant be direct democracy

2019-12-30 00:57:25 UTC  

@Death in June States rights went out the window a century ago.

2019-12-30 00:57:30 UTC  

the current system where its based on individual states is fine

2019-12-30 00:57:32 UTC  

But I'm pretty on board with the Federal Government enforcing certain freedoms for all citizens in all states

2019-12-30 00:57:34 UTC  

no reason to ruin that

2019-12-30 00:57:39 UTC  

I meant the UK

2019-12-30 00:57:50 UTC  

Like BRexit going to the people was the right decision imo

2019-12-30 00:57:58 UTC  

sure so what's the point of weighting votes from different states differently

2019-12-30 00:58:07 UTC  

@Storin Ignoring the fact the UK public never voted to join it.

2019-12-30 00:58:17 UTC  

@Andrew Popa 2.0 ya but depends what you mean. The whole “crush states rights” bit seems a bit..... much?

2019-12-30 00:58:19 UTC  

Everyone seems to have ignored/forgotten that fact.

2019-12-30 00:58:19 UTC  

Doesn't matter, we got a say in leaving it

2019-12-30 00:58:21 UTC  

Say for example in the US you could consume marijuana that you've just legally bought from a store in a state and get arrested for it in another

2019-12-30 00:58:30 UTC  

The fact that generation didn't go to task is their own fault

2019-12-30 00:58:37 UTC  

It does matter. No vote - 100% rejection.

2019-12-30 00:58:47 UTC  

marijuana isnt federally legal

2019-12-30 00:58:48 UTC  

This also goes on top a shit load of varying gun controls laws

2019-12-30 00:58:49 UTC  

you fucking retard

2019-12-30 00:58:52 UTC  

Alcohol laws

2019-12-30 00:58:58 UTC  

I know that

2019-12-30 00:59:03 UTC  

well if enough people in the state dont want pot heads but their neighboring state does not mind

2019-12-30 00:59:03 UTC  

@Andrew Popa 2.0 even if the feds could enforce stuff they would still arrest you for marijuana