Message from @Monstrous Moonshine
Discord ID: 656371883402330112
Sup brother @Orwellian Snake
@snake 🖖 hey brother
Anyway, I’m going to bed
Night bro
Cya
Anyway, don't know if ironic or nonironic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thor_Steinar
I don't wear that brand. I prefer stuff like Särmä (Varusteleka) or Miltec/Sturm.
@snake Do I count as weird since I wear Wehrmacht M36 leather trenchcoat ironically and pretty casually?
Not genuine paraphernalia, obviously.
I just like leather trenchcoats when it's cool and raining. It's both warm and waterproof.
And it's not faggot latex "leather" like in The Matrix. I'm more trenchcoat mafia than trenchcoat mafia itself.
Oh, the nazi is sleeping already.
Now goodnight
The actual trenchcoat mafia was pretty cringe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=su_vpW3mM5w
20 years ago.
@ETBrooD Went afk due to irl stuff
>Can you explain g to me?
g can be roughly said to be the "innate problem solving ability" of a person, which is the underlying basis for "intelligence"
A test with higher g loading correlates with other test taking ability in a cognitively complex task. For instance, if you score high on, say, backward digit span, you are more likely to score high on another test with a high g loading etc.
The main part is that g highly heritability, hence subtests which are more g loaded are more heritable than subtests which are less g loaded
It has also been seen through the Flynn Effect that subtests with lower g loading are more 'malleable'
So the rise in "IQ scores" of, say, a black African's offspring in US due to better environmental conditions will be more in subtests like forward digit span (a low g loaded subtest related to rote memory) than, say, Raven's Progressive Matrices
To quote Arthur Jensen, "the rise in IQ scores in the US have been hollow for g"
I suggest the great book on this by Jensen called "The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability"
@Cobra Commander Whiic labels people he disagrees with on the right as "Nazis" since he is a petulant boomer
This video, which you have often posted here to dunk on JF, also has a great description of the g factor from 57:33 to 1:07:59 @ETBrooD
Whiic is taking a little time off in the cell
@Monstrous Moonshine Too bad your explanation comes many hours too late.
You had a chance to prove that you're not a phony and you blew it. I'm not buying your excuse, you saw my comment.
What?
>Too bad your explanation comes many hours too late.
Turns out that people have other stuff to attend to irl lmfao
>You had a chance to prove that you're not a phony and you blew it. I'm not buying your excuse, you saw my comment.
Says the guy repeating the idiotic spiel regarding g, refuted in the same video he has linked multiple times (JF Gariepy is a scientist) and didn't understand the philosophical underpinnings of his own ideology when confronted in a debate a few months ago (Rothbard's justification of NAP and Anarcho Capitalism)
Projection is thy name
In other news,
> our new approach estimates larger FST values of 26% for native worldwide human populations and 23% for admixed Hispanic individuals, whereas the existing approach estimates 9.8% and 2.6%
