Message from @n0ne0ther

Discord ID: 651434498210136106


2019-12-03 14:42:59 UTC  

Freedom bombs.

2019-12-03 14:43:00 UTC  

the Trauma completely redefined its identity

2019-12-03 14:43:17 UTC  

That or maybe the US rebuilding japan.

2019-12-03 14:43:45 UTC  

@Ryoma Nagare and after they were ruled by an american

2019-12-03 14:43:46 UTC  

and having a permanent base.

2019-12-03 14:43:49 UTC  

i mean surely after something like that rebuilding is to be exected

2019-12-03 14:44:21 UTC  

You think Germany or the Soviets would have rebuilt what they nuked?

2019-12-03 14:45:06 UTC  

I just say that an A bomb in Iran, wouldn't be the worst thing, if you could live with the cost of human life.

2019-12-03 14:45:46 UTC  

Nah, the opposite. The regular Iranian is sold on liberty, freedom and markets.

2019-12-03 14:45:54 UTC  

YOu'd be killing supporters

2019-12-03 14:45:57 UTC  

I feel they've been underused in "modern warfare"

2019-12-03 14:46:07 UTC  

@Ryoma Nagare ok Mac Arthur

2019-12-03 14:46:14 UTC  

lol

2019-12-03 14:46:16 UTC  

calm down

2019-12-03 14:46:18 UTC  

Nukes have lasting effects

2019-12-03 14:46:25 UTC  

Could be why.

2019-12-03 14:46:26 UTC  

especially modern nukes

2019-12-03 14:46:45 UTC  

true, but so do 15 years of limited warfare

2019-12-03 14:47:13 UTC  

If you bomb Tehran with an A bomb, you'll be radiating multiple local countries and shit as well.

2019-12-03 14:47:42 UTC  

What Iran needs is a reason to have deplomatic elections.

2019-12-03 14:48:07 UTC  

The US welcoming them to the world stage in exchange for free elections would go a long way.

2019-12-03 14:48:19 UTC  

I bet they'd take it.

2019-12-03 14:49:28 UTC  

I don't think a well used tactical nuke exploding at the correct altitude, generates that much fallout

2019-12-03 14:49:52 UTC  

but probably yeah , and thats why they haven't been used

2019-12-03 14:50:11 UTC  

arial explosion is normal from what I understand, it amplyfies the force or something.

2019-12-03 14:51:38 UTC  

yes, but reduces fallout

2019-12-03 14:52:15 UTC  

the worst fallout is irradiated soil , sublimated and thrown into the air, thats what creates the whole "post apocalyptic" picture people have of an atomic explosion

2019-12-03 14:53:06 UTC  

Pretty sure it still radiates the area pretty heavily as it's dragged though the area with the weather.

2019-12-03 14:53:16 UTC  

but really if you think Hiroshima and Nagasaki, became viable cities only a a couple decades after the explosions, compared to places thatw ere used for underground testing for example

2019-12-03 14:53:36 UTC  

I'm not saying you are wrong

2019-12-03 14:53:45 UTC  

I'm not 100% either way.

2019-12-03 14:54:07 UTC  

just thinking that maybe considering the costs of long wars it might not be that farfetched

2019-12-03 14:54:21 UTC  

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were different bombs as well, so I dunno how much diff that makes.

2019-12-03 14:54:37 UTC  

yeah they were smaller , and pure fission

2019-12-03 14:54:47 UTC  

I don't think the middle east would calm down just because we nuke Iran though.

2019-12-03 14:54:59 UTC  

pretty small compared to what the huge 80s bombs

2019-12-03 14:55:25 UTC  

but you could absolutely make smaller cleaner bombs that would erase a whole city and force a country into submission

2019-12-03 14:55:55 UTC  

Might aswell tomahawk Tehran's higher ups.

2019-12-03 14:56:04 UTC  

true

2019-12-03 14:56:08 UTC  

That's what they did in Iraq.

2019-12-03 14:56:10 UTC  

problem with that