like this may be a serious problem in the future if they ever gain real power

WE ARE RACIST

And young; young dumb and ugly!

YEAH, THAT'S WHAT WE ARE, WE ARE YOUNG!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvGADgehKoM

@snake There is a point to it, like everybodydothatdinosaur said: it wins the normies. But ethnosperg wouldn't understand normies so I guess it's obvious this comes as a surprise.

It's also a statement of fact, whether it should carry meaning or not.

It forces the left to either do self-reflection on hatred toward whites (or bigotry of low expectations toward blacks in form of affirmative action)... or make insane excuses like "bigotry against whites is not racism because XYZ" which everyone (incl. themselves) knows to be a lie. Hence, it's about holding them to their standards or forcing them to defend blatant hypocrisy in a way that is apparent to even the dumb normies.

The only people who really hate lefties being called racists are the handful of full retards who think racism is a virtue that should be pursue... and that is BLM and AR. But you are both retards.

https://youtu.be/QsX6Nuaxhjo

Doesn’t matter if it wins over the normies, you already have them, feminists and progressives are unpopular.

And no they don’t do any sort of self reflection, even if you try to force them. I thought the NPC meme made this clear.

Nope, wrong. No one things racist is a label to achieve except hitlerities. People like Jared Taylor or the Alt Hype simply don’t care either or about it.

The position of people like the alt hype is that racism as a term doesn’t matter at all

So when you say “it’s a statement of fact” we just go “no it literally can’t be as such, since the label is so vague and useless”

@whiic

Ignore the alt-right/hype. They have no power.

At least, that's what I do.

Their ideas have long since been exposed as bad.

Also one more note on the power of SJW’s, they have power from being the media/corporate/political/educational elite

They have institutional power not grass roots support

@Goodwood of Dank™ well, define “alt right”

Is it someone that’s just too “far right” in your opinion?

No. It's folks like Spencer and Taylor.

People who peddle their own form of ethnonationalism and progressivism.

Well Taylor isn’t a progressive or a ethno nationalist

He doesn’t want to break the us up

My mistake.

But you get my drift, I'm sure.

Yeah I do

Excellent. <:sargonfingerguns:568463117856669696>

Well actually after thinking about it for a second I don’t

Because I need your definition of alt right

And if it’s progressivism with ethno nationalism

Well I mean that works

Definition works or their model for society works?

We’re talking about definitions here

Like, define “alt right”

Anyway, just because someone has a radical answer doesn’t mean their wrong. And vice versa, just because someone takes the moderate centrist position doesn’t mean their correct

That’s a logical fallacy

Ethno-nationalism is part of it, sure. As well as a form of fascist progressivism such as having the state be arbiter of all things (the "ethical state") and opposition to things like multiculturalism and individualism.

There are certain points of alt-right ideology that are worthwhile, but that's not saying much. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Is that a sufficient definition? I can go on...