My pleasure.

Not only are Hispanics considered white alot of the time

But police and courts commonly put the wrong race down

Wait, that makes no sense

They separate between whites and blacks, and then between hispanics and others

Are you complaining?

Yes, it's unreadable

I prefer hispanics separate from whites.

Soon, they'll stop recording race altogether because offensive patriarchy white supremacy bullshit

I prefer clear scientific separations

@Jeremy > I prefer hispanics separate from whites

Wow, something we agree on <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Whites are not a racial monolith, so why are they treated as a monolith, but hispanics are treated as an ethnic monolith, that table is manipulative

They already are, @Goddess Tyche...

I believe the reasons are self-evident.

Their communities are separate from ours.

They have separate categories but that doesn't mean that people are being labelled or sorted properly

You assume its a functional system

Yeah the labels don't make any scientific sense, they're intersecting all sorts of groups and then separating them elsewhere.

It must be either-or. Either they look at broad generalizations of groups, or they don't.

Categorically the method must be the same across the board, or else it's manipulative.

Hispanics and light skinned blacks often get recorded as white as well.

Interesting to see the FBI has been infiltrated with SJW nonsense, too

What hasn't been at this point?

The fbi gathers the data they don't create it

Like I said, only a matter of time before race stats go unrecorded due to some bullshit excuse.

Police and courts create the data

Or just unreported on.

How much you wanna bet there are white-skinned African Americans in that list who are recorded as "white"

The majority of which is attained via their identification records, whether government-issued identification, or birth records if they're absent. There's many ways they pool accurate records.

Yeah, and if it's unscientific it must be thrown out for being useless

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awXX_ofcKks have fun with this shitshow

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6D3JlLtjnM

@ETBrooD What you're describing then is voluntaryism, not Nationalism

The closest thing that comes to it is National Anarchism, which still doesn't respect Lockean concept of property rights

So again, Nationalism is inherently collective

Involuntary actions are not inherent within nationalism, they're inherent within authoritarianism.

> identification with one's own nation and support for its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.

Doesn't mean it must be enforced

> support for its interests

Not the individual's interests, but the collectives' interest

That's an argument for collectivism being authoritarian, not for nationalism being authoritarian.