Message from @everybodydothatdinosaur

Discord ID: 654527716799807504


2019-12-12 00:03:16 UTC  

like everyone is an intellectual or intellectually gifted, which is kinda required to understand and argue

2019-12-12 00:03:42 UTC  

some are physically stronger. some are better with people and reading body language

2019-12-12 00:04:03 UTC  

there are all types of skill-sets that you probably have never even experienced

2019-12-12 00:04:39 UTC  

assuming that everyone has the tools to argue effectively is like the commies assuming everyone is willing to give up their shit like they are

2019-12-12 00:05:19 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633967610706526210/654473819674902529/ducking_tholos.jpg

2019-12-12 00:05:31 UTC  

the world is NEVER like you. However, because birds of a feather flock together, more often than not it SEEMS the majority of people are similar to you

2019-12-12 00:05:58 UTC  

Tim's world is a world you would quite likely struggle to navigate

2019-12-12 00:06:28 UTC  

🍅

2019-12-12 02:16:55 UTC  

‘May the (Space) Force be with you,’ Congress tells Trump in new Pentagon budget bill https://www.rt.com/usa/475636-trump-space-force-ndaa/

2019-12-12 03:01:02 UTC  

w00t!

2019-12-12 03:01:13 UTC  

My novel is coming true!

2019-12-12 03:11:15 UTC  

wonder what their pt standards will be compared to af

2019-12-12 03:19:12 UTC  

Given how much astronauts are put through, I'd wager it'll be tougher than the Chair Force. But that's only if we actually start forming units that're expected to go into space.

2019-12-12 03:19:37 UTC  

There's a reason astronauts are almost exclusively pilots.

2019-12-12 03:26:44 UTC  

Amazing.

2019-12-12 03:26:49 UTC  

Now we can nuke China

2019-12-12 03:26:51 UTC  

FROM ORBIT

2019-12-12 03:27:08 UTC  

Kek.

2019-12-12 03:33:19 UTC  

Fight the commies in space

2019-12-12 03:38:36 UTC  

Well for example a large ship with a railgun on it could do kinetic bombardment, that is dropping things that effectivley turn in to like meteorites when they land

2019-12-12 03:39:28 UTC  

They would have more energy than explosives pound for pound, so they could do more damage with a lower weight; but the main advantage is that if you were a soldier you could call in what is effectivley an artillery/airstrike anywhere in the world at any time and have it happen in like 30 seconds

2019-12-12 03:40:47 UTC  

With orbital artillery, you could shoot like rounds down to earth anytime you wanted, within a several hundred mile range with relative ease, from each ship that is effectivley in orbit above an area. So you could station like a few frigates or something over afghanistan and anytime you needed it, bomb the crap out of the enemy without having to wait for a plane to fly by or hope artillery is nearby, you'd have it essentially anywhere in the whole country on demand within seconds or minutes

2019-12-12 03:41:40 UTC  

just in free fall a projectile would fall at like 8 km/s, which would be like 32 megajoules per kilogram, or 8 times that of TNT

2019-12-12 03:44:16 UTC  

and the projectile would be great at piercing armor due to it's high velocity, localize the effects more so you could adjust the blast radius essentially and would have no fall-out or unexploded ordinance, meaning it would be less dangerous for the environment. A very large road that was slightly accelerated, say to 11-14 km/s, would easily have the force of an atomic bomb, although such weapons are already banned. The variable yield capability is a pretty big advantage as well, as simply altering it's flight path/initial velocity would mean you could increase or decrease power. Also, you could have the projectile explode in to dozens of little projectiles right before it hits the ground, thus acting more like shrapnel. The high velocity would mean good penetration, and something like a depleted uranium round would be cheaper. So kinetic bombardment is one advantage, another is an easier time communicating with sattelites, and the third is potentially transporting stuff from space but that's less feasible

2019-12-12 03:44:37 UTC  

He who rules space, rules the world. However, you're getting ahead of yourself; first we have to develop stable military platforms from which to stage any sort of orbital presence.

2019-12-12 03:44:51 UTC  

Exactly

2019-12-12 03:44:53 UTC  

We're quite a ways from having space warships.

2019-12-12 03:44:59 UTC  

But even if there's no space battles having spaceships would still be neat

2019-12-12 03:45:06 UTC  

Oh, absolutely.

2019-12-12 03:45:08 UTC  

it would be dual use for shooting down other spaceships or bombing targets from space

2019-12-12 03:45:30 UTC  

I've got a novel series in the works that explores some of the themes of humanity asserting itself in space.

2019-12-12 03:45:38 UTC  

As well as current politics and cultural trends.

2019-12-12 03:45:57 UTC  

and you could carry a ton of ammunition since pound for pound it would be far lighter than comparitive explosives. A 10 pound projectile could deliver as much power as a 500 pound bomb, and so you wouldn't need to carry as much ordiance, and the nearly unlimited range of several hundred or thousand miles and the nearly instant bombardment would be nice

2019-12-12 03:45:59 UTC  

Neat 😄

2019-12-12 03:46:15 UTC  

I mean as a soldier imagine calling it an air strike in like 30 seconds any time you wanted it lol

2019-12-12 03:46:21 UTC  

That would be pretty neat

2019-12-12 03:46:40 UTC  

Well, the projectiles are considerably lighter, but the energy it takes to send them plunging into the atmosphere isn't inconsiderable.

2019-12-12 03:46:53 UTC  

The initmidation effect of looking up and being able to see it from hundreds of miles would also be something

2019-12-12 03:46:58 UTC  

Guidance systems also need power.

2019-12-12 03:47:10 UTC  

Well, you can't really see it coming.

2019-12-12 03:47:44 UTC  

Well the theory is a very large nuclear reactor powering the whole thing