Message from @SimonTV

Discord ID: 653774530917040141


2019-12-10 01:42:37 UTC  

Heard of that one. No, haven't read it. If i remember right, i thought about it but the Foreward was looking to support an argument rather than reveiw the historical events

2019-12-10 01:42:40 UTC  

The Myth of German Villainy is a decent book

2019-12-10 01:43:04 UTC  

i think it lacks sources though

2019-12-10 01:43:27 UTC  

most books these days do

2019-12-10 01:43:36 UTC  

short form books realy

2019-12-10 01:43:39 UTC  

design for the masses

2019-12-10 01:43:57 UTC  

i mean, i'm from the days when if you cited wikipedia, your paper was dismissed out of hand

2019-12-10 01:44:25 UTC  

if wikipedia is valid, THEY have sources somewhere. track these down and cite them AND their sources

2019-12-10 01:44:33 UTC  

wikipedia is a joke these days

2019-12-10 01:44:43 UTC  

always was in my view

2019-12-10 01:44:54 UTC  

There are a lot of wikipedia sources that are literally just advertisement sites now

2019-12-10 01:45:07 UTC  

The older citation domains get bought up and replaced

2019-12-10 01:45:09 UTC  

there was a period when it was ok, but hte marxist moved in and re-wrote all the articles

2019-12-10 01:45:44 UTC  

I still have an old article on the peasants revolt saved

2019-12-10 01:45:48 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633966934622208031/653774334892179486/tumblr_mtaut86uis1qz5a8co1_500.png

2019-12-10 01:45:53 UTC  

well, the academic community as a whole suffers from the problem that those papers that are POPULAR receive the most citations

2019-12-10 01:45:57 UTC  

it was rewritten and framed from a marxist perspective

2019-12-10 01:46:09 UTC  

and the more citations a paper has, the more credibility it is give

2019-12-10 01:46:14 UTC  

so it's a feed-back loop

2019-12-10 01:46:19 UTC  

it was essentially an anti-tax protest but the wikipedia article now states it was an early example of marxist revolution lol

2019-12-10 01:46:34 UTC  

yea the sources they accept are left wing media sites

2019-12-10 01:46:47 UTC  

which use wikipedia as their source

2019-12-10 01:47:07 UTC  

that drives me crazy when people go back and spin events to suit a particular narrativ

2019-12-10 01:47:26 UTC  

i guess that is history in a nut shell

2019-12-10 01:47:52 UTC  

the trick to learning history is learn which perspective the person who wrote it had and interpret it with a grain of salt.

2019-12-10 01:48:04 UTC  

well, there is a difference between documenting an event and interpreting an event

2019-12-10 01:48:18 UTC  

there is a fine line

2019-12-10 01:48:38 UTC  

from one side they were attacked, from the other they were attacked

2019-12-10 01:48:49 UTC  

used to be because it took TIME and MONEY to compile the history, there were MUCH fewer sources and thus they were held to a higher standard

2019-12-10 01:49:12 UTC  

when less people controlled the narrative it was easier to control

2019-12-10 01:49:20 UTC  

today, the internet devalues things like truth and art

2019-12-10 01:49:29 UTC  

its easier to read history as objectively as possible. the treaty of versaille crippled germany to the point of desperation

2019-12-10 01:49:37 UTC  

and you basically get what happens in the Dark Knight

2019-12-10 01:49:45 UTC  

it was HARDER to control actually

2019-12-10 01:49:46 UTC  

dont salt the earth

2019-12-10 01:49:58 UTC  

you have to go back to the 1800s to understand ww1 and 2

2019-12-10 01:50:05 UTC  

the abandoned child will burn his village to feel its warmth, etc

2019-12-10 01:50:28 UTC  

how is it harder to control?

2019-12-10 01:50:39 UTC  

that is why the church and monarchy didn't like the printing press

2019-12-10 01:50:42 UTC  

because if you are a gate-keeper and everyone has to come to you for information, all eyes are on you making it VERY hard for you to lie and get away with it continually

2019-12-10 01:50:45 UTC  

they didn't want to lose control over the narrative