I am pointing out documenteries that show the german side to the story

funny how few people realize that the DNC was rigged by the Mob BEFORE

Truman

then you claim oh you musn't get your information from on place, do you understand how stupid you sound?

I DO know the allied side of wwii

everyone does

but the allied side is exaggerated

*Yawn*

both sides focus on their own atrocities as i said earlier

not always

did you watch hellstorm ?

also, there is a SIGNIGIFICANT difference between books that were written pre-internet and afterwards

for example, William Shreiber's "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" is far more thourough than most historical texts written since the fall of the the Soviet Union

have you read "the bad war" ?

what about "The Myth of German Villainy"?

Heard of that one. No, haven't read it. If i remember right, i thought about it but the Foreward was looking to support an argument rather than reveiw the historical events

The Myth of German Villainy is a decent book

i think it lacks sources though

most books these days do

short form books realy

design for the masses

i mean, i'm from the days when if you cited wikipedia, your paper was dismissed out of hand

if wikipedia is valid, THEY have sources somewhere. track these down and cite them AND their sources

wikipedia is a joke these days

always was in my view

There are a lot of wikipedia sources that are literally just advertisement sites now

The older citation domains get bought up and replaced

there was a period when it was ok, but hte marxist moved in and re-wrote all the articles

I still have an old article on the peasants revolt saved

well, the academic community as a whole suffers from the problem that those papers that are POPULAR receive the most citations

it was rewritten and framed from a marxist perspective

and the more citations a paper has, the more credibility it is give

so it's a feed-back loop

it was essentially an anti-tax protest but the wikipedia article now states it was an early example of marxist revolution lol

yea the sources they accept are left wing media sites

which use wikipedia as their source

that drives me crazy when people go back and spin events to suit a particular narrativ

i guess that is history in a nut shell

the trick to learning history is learn which perspective the person who wrote it had and interpret it with a grain of salt.

well, there is a difference between documenting an event and interpreting an event