Message from @SimonTV
Discord ID: 653773187791978497
you are dense, you know that?
only you know the true history, you must be so happy with yourself
never made that claim; strawman
did you watch the greatest story never told?
however a perspective informed by BOTH sides from MULTIPLE sources is more balanced that a perspective from a single perspective
yes, i have seen that one a few times
oh please, how can one not know the allied side of ww2, it has been bombarded in to westerners from the very young age
I am pointing out documenteries that show the german side to the story
funny how few people realize that the DNC was rigged by the Mob BEFORE
Truman
then you claim oh you musn't get your information from on place, do you understand how stupid you sound?
I DO know the allied side of wwii
everyone does
but the allied side is exaggerated
*Yawn*
both sides focus on their own atrocities as i said earlier
not always
did you watch hellstorm ?
also, there is a SIGNIGIFICANT difference between books that were written pre-internet and afterwards
for example, William Shreiber's "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" is far more thourough than most historical texts written since the fall of the the Soviet Union
what about "The Myth of German Villainy"?
Heard of that one. No, haven't read it. If i remember right, i thought about it but the Foreward was looking to support an argument rather than reveiw the historical events
The Myth of German Villainy is a decent book
i think it lacks sources though
most books these days do
short form books realy
design for the masses
i mean, i'm from the days when if you cited wikipedia, your paper was dismissed out of hand
if wikipedia is valid, THEY have sources somewhere. track these down and cite them AND their sources
wikipedia is a joke these days
always was in my view
There are a lot of wikipedia sources that are literally just advertisement sites now
The older citation domains get bought up and replaced
there was a period when it was ok, but hte marxist moved in and re-wrote all the articles
I still have an old article on the peasants revolt saved
well, the academic community as a whole suffers from the problem that those papers that are POPULAR receive the most citations
it was rewritten and framed from a marxist perspective
and the more citations a paper has, the more credibility it is give
so it's a feed-back loop