Message from @Naantje

Discord ID: 657757406255906818


2019-12-21 01:30:32 UTC  

I would argue they're difficult for different reasons.

2019-12-21 01:30:56 UTC  

@Jack of Trades Ah, see, you're looking at ICs from a manufacturing perspective.

2019-12-21 01:31:07 UTC  

I'm speaking of *utilization*.

2019-12-21 01:31:09 UTC  

As I said above, JoT doesn't understand the complexity of making trade-offs

2019-12-21 01:31:25 UTC  

for him, there is just ONE approach to everything

2019-12-21 01:31:33 UTC  

@Canadalake I didn't though <:slurpgon:583424900732157956>

Now I will probably crave mcdonald's tho

2019-12-21 01:31:39 UTC  

so, serially, marching doesn't appear as complex

2019-12-21 01:31:44 UTC  

@Laucivol ok? Left, right, left, right flank.... march vs

2019-12-21 01:31:55 UTC  

I don't give a shit about the quality of the doping, thermal considerations and so one in the context of the metaphor.

2019-12-21 01:32:11 UTC  

but, if you examine thecombiatorical aspect, it is

2019-12-21 01:32:11 UTC  

Because that would expand to *uniform* regulations.

2019-12-21 01:32:13 UTC  

Too many crossed sends to mcdicks

2019-12-21 01:32:17 UTC  

The challenge with marching isn't the concept, but the implementation.

2019-12-21 01:32:22 UTC  

At least I stopped that nonsense

2019-12-21 01:32:33 UTC  

When you have multiple individuals responsible for collective success, there's alot more room for error.

2019-12-21 01:32:33 UTC  

As well as *individual* hydration.

2019-12-21 01:32:37 UTC  

R u guys arguing about marching?

2019-12-21 01:32:46 UTC  

Comparing marching to technical implementation

2019-12-21 01:33:03 UTC  

I need to know enough math and the understanding of the components function to properly implement this thing. @Laucivol

2019-12-21 01:33:05 UTC  

ask JoT if 10^10 prcesses are more complicated than 10! processes

2019-12-21 01:33:06 UTC  

Has the british left extremists already started rioting in the streets after the election results?

2019-12-21 01:33:25 UTC  

And one could *easily* expand it to the aforementioned underlying components. @Jack of Trades

2019-12-21 01:33:26 UTC  

@Mersenne true, but room for error != complicated

2019-12-21 01:33:33 UTC  
2019-12-21 01:33:40 UTC  

All the way back to Basic/Boot if we must.

2019-12-21 01:33:56 UTC  

And into an individual's rearing, if we must.

2019-12-21 01:33:58 UTC  

@Laucivolso now you're going back to manufacturing but won't allow me the same

2019-12-21 01:34:07 UTC  

that's also a misnomer; you need to know ENOUGH math regarding the material charicteristics, not all of it

2019-12-21 01:34:09 UTC  

@Laucivol be consistent

2019-12-21 01:34:15 UTC  

because most is IDEAL

2019-12-21 01:34:19 UTC  

That's how *ridiculous* bringing up doping is.

2019-12-21 01:34:25 UTC  

^^

2019-12-21 01:34:33 UTC  

agreed. severe autism

2019-12-21 01:34:42 UTC  

that's why he blocks me

2019-12-21 01:34:50 UTC  

@Laucivol you didn't make a point just now because I adjusted my argument to fit the boundaries you set.

2019-12-21 01:34:57 UTC  

Speaking of technicality I do have to finish a certain report this weekend. Urgh

2019-12-21 01:35:02 UTC  

LOL

2019-12-21 01:35:09 UTC  

Then you exceeded those boundaries. You just suck at argumentation

2019-12-21 01:35:12 UTC  

Yes, because you tried the same play on me, fren. @Jack of Trades

2019-12-21 01:35:12 UTC  

so, you made a point... he move the goalposts

2019-12-21 01:35:14 UTC  

@Sarahdale have fun