https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/atheism-is-inconsistent-with-the-scientific-method-prizewinning-physicist-says/?fbclid=IwAR3UO9b6jfv4lHJSWxyQsbpmEr2KzsylOgKwlIvH5t9irDqLZCxTlk3iVXU

ok prize winning physicists have said the opposite

read

niger

faget

read

Is God consistent with the scientific method?

is a total disbelief in God consistent in it?

lmao he literally says there is no evidence for God in the article

the scientific is flawed

so should I be agnostic about fairies too?

because its based on our observations

which are flawed

or santa?

You can't prove a negative, and I don't see evidence for either of them

so the only logical thing to do is say

"idk maybe they are real"

how are our observations flawe

so

you are saying

your senses are perfect?

If the Big Bang is real then what the fuck exploded

nothing exploded

that sounds pretty contradictory tbf

it was an expansion of space and time

not an explosion in the way you are thinking

but nothing existed before

nothing can't make something by itself

Then how did it appear

Yeah

What expanded into existence if there was nothing there in the first place?

in short, we currently don't know yet. Before the Planck Epoch (only the smallest fraction of a second after the big bang) the universe would have been dominated by the force of quantum gravity. quantum gravity is the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics, and describes how gravity might function at the subatomic level. We currently do not have a theory of quantum gravity (but we are working on one!) so we cannot be sure what existed prior to the aforementioned epoch. It is also believed that if the universe were condensed into a singularity (we call this the 'initial singularity) as general relativity predicts, space and time would have been united and indistinguishable. This goes into some pretty complex stuff like Imaginary time (imaginary time has not yet been confirmed)

did you see all this happen

no, its similar to a crime scene. We see the blood on the walls, a recently fired handgun in the bushes a few meters away, and a dead body

using these clues we determine what happened in the past

We look at the clues in our universe, such as the redshift of galaxies, the cosmic microwave background radiation, and the abundance of quasars in the distant universe, then come to a conclusion about the past

Global Warming Natural Cycle — OSS Foundation

http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/natural-cycle

thanks for the completely relevant link

global warming

Global warming is real?

I've always wondered do people in political servers take the time to study this shit, or assumptions, or just go by the media