Message from @Riley
Discord ID: 618469946560610325
middle eastern and north african
Still that doesnt counter the fact that religous societies have existed for millenia in stability, as in social stability and the capacity to withstand pressures and not implode
meanwhile providing also meaningful scientific advancement (europe is a prime example of this)
I mean secular countries have done literally the same
even atheistic countries
There is nothing about religion or has been that has stifled, especially in europe, scientific advancement.
And secular countries are imploding
no secular nation is imploding
atheistic countries are imploding as well.
nor can you demonstrate how secularism alone is the cause of this "implosion"
-> looks at demographics and the entire west"
-> realizes islam is taking over
oof
OH MY GOD A FEW EUROPEAN NATIONS HAVE 1% MUSLIM POPULATION HOLY SHIT EUROPE ISMUSLIM NOW
(or other religiously focused groups)
OH MY GOD
lol
THEY ARE LITERALLY TAKINGOVER THE WORLD
you know im right
secular society simply cannot compete with them
hence they get replaced
oh yea the western nations cannot compete with uhh
Saudi Arabia
Iran
societies that have not socially progressed past 500 AD
Meanwhile iran has been analyzed to be capable to defeat the USA in war
kek
their societies are better
they wont die out
literally we see replacement of secular peoples
and who analyzed this?
y religious ones
a top military general of the US, Iran isnt really technologically backwards their investemnet into science and development is huge
they are publishing research papers at a staggering rate its insane
Iran is a unique case however since its not arabic culture, they are persian after all and so have a veryd different development compared to the typical arab country
im looking these things up and im not finding a single article on this general
or what he said
idk where you are getting this from
look the point is religion is inherently unscientific
religion itself doesnt need to be scientific, im not arguing that it is scientific rather that it does not impede science. If it does then those are (im pretty sure by catholic teaching as well) (so were talking fundumentalist thinking) heretics
or non christian