Message from @primarina
Discord ID: 633747360840810516
Which it clearly is
So, from websters intrinsic
And morality
Is saying objective morality ambiguous because objective can mean unbiased?
You described an argument for those definitions leading to "morality intrinsic to reality"
It is to some people who are uneducated, but we don't worry about that because both versions are so widely used, and are also closely related.
Now how about *the only use* of intrinsic morality
Arguably, the word can be taken to have the same meaning in both cases, and the differences explained with omission
We shouldn't worry about it
Non bias in a person's view, and being q real feature of reality isn't synonymous
The danger here is people are at greater risk of being mislead
Do you think people have an IQ of 2
My interpretation is likely the interpretation of the common man
I've never had anyone make that mistake before
You shouldn't use the intelligence of others as a crutch, rely on it when necessary
If someone doesn't know, they google intrinsic morality
Except, my version of the phrase is also valid
You clarfied what you meant, and I accepted that meaning
Sure, but that also means nothing at all in the context I used it, so to know more people will google it
Or they'd ask you for clarification
Nor was I talking to you to begin with, why would your interpretation matter?
and / or possibly have a bad internet connection at the moment, ioi
Me and that person discuss this all the time, they knew what I'm talking about
You show up with zero context and assume you will have a good opinion
You clarified your point, I talked about I didn't read it that way, and how I took issue with the language
You then clarified that it was a term of art
And took issue when I tried to use the component words in other ways; morality intrinsic to the subject
I took issue because I already clarified the only use of the word, and you were trying to address *other* uses of it when that wasn't the argument
I wanted to address other uses because they were how I intended to make my point
Those points are immaterial to what was at hand
I believe there can be morality intrinsic to the subject, and I believe that language for describing them is permissible and proper.
Why is whether I can something the way I choose to say it immaterial?
That's just subjective morality, and has never been called "intrinsic", the argument is that existentialism necessitates subjectivism
Because that point right there is not relevant to the argument at hand
The point I wanted to make was primarily about intrinsic subjective morality and language usage solutions
Intrinsic subjective morality is distinct from non-intrinsic subjective morality
Like I said, irrelevant
To your end, not to mine.
If you want to start a separate debate then sure but I wanted Addie to respond
TBF, one goal of mine was to question why objective morality has value, and why objective morality is necessary to reject pedophillia