The Zero Effect

you must be thinking of heisenbergs uncertainty principle

"One of the oddest predictions of quantum theory – that a system can't change while you're watching it – has been confirmed in an experiment by Cornell physicists."

ΔxΔp ≥ (ℏ/2)

I'm not a mathmatician

Anyways back to 5 says

o

@The Desert Fox V take over I need to go to class

<:ket:586968975619915779>

"We see things in the world that vary in degrees of goodness, truth, nobility, etc. For example, well-drawn circles are better than poorly drawn ones, healthy animals are better than sick animals. Moreover, some substances are better than others, since living things are better than non-living things, and animals are better than plants, in testimony of which no one would choose to lose their senses for the sake of having the longevity of a tree. But judging something as being "more" or "less" implies some standard against which it is being judged. For example in a room full of people of varying heights, at least one must be tallest. Therefore, there is something which is best and most true, and most a being, etc. Aquinas then adds the premise: what is most in a genus is the cause of all else in that genus. From this he deduces that there exists some most-good being which causes goodness in all else, and this everyone understands to be God."

why are well-drawn circles better than poorly drawn ones

there is no objective "better"

You just said a poorly drawn circle, you admit yourself it's worse

and once again

Unless you imply there is no difference between a perfect and imperfect circle

how did he determine that this is god

like bruh

We judge better and worse

Against what

Implying there must be something absolutely best/good

As a standard

they are relative to other things in our enviroment

not really

lets go back to circles

we determine whether or not a circle is good by comparing it to our idea of a perfect circle

so we have an idea of a perfect circle

however, there are no perfect circles in nature

so just because we have a concept of ideal or perfection

doesnt mean it exists

Where does this idea of a perfect circle come from?

What standard says a circle can even be perfect

What says the entire concept of perfection even exists

the idea of a perfect circle comes from what we know about circles. We know that circles have no edges, therefore the most circular object possible would have no...shit how do i say it

wait hold that thought

i need to go

we will continue later

Same

if you don't get what im saying, ill try to explain it better later

I might say this is a bastardization of the argument, although this isn't my most well versed argument

I down have time to talk anyways tho

So ponder me calling you all retards for the time being