@Maksim R u atheist?

hes clearly a Christian

@Veraic How does that matter? Christanity rejects Judaism and Jesus rebukes jews for saying "but we are abrahams ancestors" by saying he can take a rock and make it a decendant of abraham

Read the verses

Seriously

Please

I spent time getting them

@Veraic Would you consider the original Canaanites to be more Levantine?

Canaanite is kinda catch all term for that regions native population

the ethnicity is going to change

In the general sense, I mean.

@Veraic read the verses, please

@Enkrum prob a mix of Levantines and semite

I figure.

@Maksim never read the good news version before

Where did all the others who were making that terrible argument go?

Lol

only KJV and NVT

@Veraic Feel free to read the versus in KJV

itll carry the same meaning

no the translations not going to change much

i dont have my KJV bible with me rn anyway so im not going to look them up either too lazy

You can just type the verse in chat and write KJV at the end @Veraic

oh neat

Galatians 3:7 KJV

Titus 1:14 KJV

bruh

thats kinda cool

It is

Titus 1:10-11 KJV

Christianity's alright.

Certainly beneficial and good.

@Maksim so back to the problem of last night

All you said was p1 and p2 and that they don’t contradict

P1 and p2 contradicting wasn’t even in question

The problem is. I’m the Christian view it’s believed that god can not be incomplete, yet having desires defacto means you are incomplete, being complete would mean not having desires. Similarly having desires means you’re not pure actualization, Because desires are potential

That’s why your response was a dodge

Basically all of the responses boiled down to: god can’t be imperfect and yes god has will but it’s not will for himself, it’s will for us! Or god can’t be imperfect and god has will(which is just reiterating the logical problem at hand