Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 601523698620432405
@Deleted User cars are, but that's often due to lax government regulations. Cars could be made more efficient, even if they're not electric.
Honestly, I don't think the policies against climate change that have been done by now are good
lax government regulations because if you regulate them to much your economy fucking dies
oh you mean make them more efficient
sorry I didn't read the last half because I am small brain
@President Sanders📍🇺🇸 they could if buy one from 2010
Not everyone can
I can't at least from now
for*
Most of the people around me couldn't
Same with many other countries
The economy will die if automation takes the job market and climate change/migration costs trillions in the coming decades.
Strict regulations to ensure the well-being of the Earth and eco-system are necessary.
Well when automation gets to a certain point UBI will be the only way to survive
but that is nowhere close
It is very close (20-40 years)
In some ways, it is already here
I don't know about that
@Deleted User There are already some AI that are used in advanced countries
Self driving cars and AI will make menial jobs hard to find. More than half of jobs in the U.S. could be automated in 50 years
@President Sanders📍🇺🇸 Depends on the country
The infrastructure here is not suitable for AI cars
Okay well you have to think
these robots and ai are literally in their infancy
and not ready to sustain society
I think it would harm other jobs that rely on people as well
Well... most experts agree jobs will be slashed rather quickly.
New jobs will become available, but that likely mean millions of people will need to be re-trained and put in position to survive in the advancing technological world
I see even worse things, people would just lose skills that are needed for survival and self-development
Taking a pic of a person instead of drawing him is sure easier but the second choice would make him better when it comes to self-development.
(photocameras are AI too)
Also, I think robots can be used if there aren't enough places for a certain job, even though it could also mean to fire some people.
There was a car factory, forgot the name of the brand of the cars they produce, where many people of the personnel lost their job there.
... due to the AI thing
Of course, this doesn't mean new jobs couldn't be found. And I hope it will...
And I am talking about jobs that will teach you discipline and organization...
fossil ffuels should be done away with once nuclear fission is full optimul
@Deleted User this.
Nuclear fission was the answer for decades. Molten salt reactors are even safer, have less waste, but weren't ever used by the U.S. over the traditional reactors.
*Fusion* may also become a possibility. Predictions say it may be a reality in 10-30 years.
Although using it on a nationwide scale probably couldn't be accomplished for a bit longer.
TF, wh is a Communist agreeing to my view
@Deleted User first off, I'm more of a social democrat/democratic socialist. Actual communism won't be a reality in my country for decades.
As for why I agree with your view: because switching to renewable would take time and lots of money. Nuclear is relatively safe and the waste (the main problem) can be stored safely/re-used. So "Why is a communist agreeing to my view?"
Because they don't share in the stigma and see nuclear as a viable alternative, not something to be phased out entirely.
Lol you are pretty much a commie but ok
Your form of gov is also failed