Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 621495599241363475
many polish became germanised and had exactly the same rights as germans so idk what youre really talking about here
i didnt ask you to recite your last history lesson i was asking for proof of this discrimination and you respond with waffle @DrRisen
@Deleted User Many ethnic Poles were pushed out in favor of ethnic Germans. This is a well known fact. Don’t tell me you’re trying to deny it.
Labour Unions are good but should be integrated into the appartus of state.
The entire point of lebensraum was acquiring space for the ethnic German fascists, and to hell with the previous occupants.
just show me the proof ffs
if you can show me then i will concede that via a certain amount of mental gymnastics we can attribute the forced labour of poles to the DAF and i will admit that that was a situational flaw @DrRisen
Alright, what do you consider proof? @Deleted User
anything at this point would be a start even if it comes from marxists.com @DrRisen
How about a source you used?
i posted the wiki article in the first place i made no proclamations
hang on i may have read this idk
You posted it with assumed confidence that it was a reliable source of information on your topic.
im reading it
can you point me to the part where it mentions the DAF's policy to force slavs into work
cuz all i can see is that during the war ecconomy poles were forced to work
some of them innocent some of them not
no mention of the DAF's policy
You’re moving the goalpost dude. You wanted proof that poles were forced into labor in Germany, there you have it. The DAF did nothing to protect or attempt to protect the rights of polish workers.
Besides, even if all of this is irrelevant, even if we drop the subject simply out of mercy to you, there are still issues with the DAF,
The DAF's policies didnt really have anything to do with that tho
this was a side effect of the war economy
For example, collective bargaining and striking were all but eliminated under the DAF.
ok sure why not
@Deleted User *you did say any source*
yes but still
lockout were also forbidden so i dont see how this is unfair really @DrRisen
im not arguing they were marxists @Deleted User
@Deleted User That just means everyone is getting hurt.
<:ben:588490784576110593> <:ben:588490784576110593> <:ben:588490784576110593> <:ben:588490784576110593> <:ben:588490784576110593>
no it means that both the workers and bourgeois are disarmed of their tools of class warfare so that they may settle their differences amicably @DrRisen
"Fascism isn't from the past, my friend, it is eternal. Fascism predates humanity! Failed, you say? Does nature ever fail? No, though we might fail her – and that would be the end of us."
@Deleted User They couldn’t settle their differences, they were strong-armed into doing whatever the party told them to do.
@Deleted User what is your issue
Hmm?
Hell, the union reps weren’t even elected, they were appointed.
yes the workers and businessmen had to obey the gov @DrRisen
"I'm a follower of truth, first and foremost. Truth is my religion, truth is my guide, my master. And truth doesn't come from any man-made ideology. If it's an idea that someone dreamed up, then it's a definitely a falsehood. Truth comes from nature herself, from the universe. It just is.
- That all sounds very interesting, "but what does it have to do with fascism?
- My friend, that is fascism."
why are you quoting ST to me r u pranking me? @Deleted User
No
Bro