<:garfilf:606968189640769668>

^ this is probably unironic

@Riley didn't I literally curb stomp you on the subject of Aquinas and you just said you don't want to debate because it's too big brained

And I post a picture so it's easier for you to reference a concise version

You are a fool if you think Christians have bad arguments

@Eoppa I literally had no idea what you were talking about lol

like it seemed to be a modified first cause argument

its not my fault you are shit at explaining things

<:groyper:515728068275601419>

It's literally *the* first cause argument

It's been deformed by people who don't understand it, so you've probably heard those explanations

It's not my fault you think like this ```Perhaps im not understanding, I do science, not philosophy```

<:smug:591181720565579807>

lol unironic scientism from addie

ok and my response is

if there was a first cause

how do you know it was a god

let alone your god

I don't understand how this is so hard for Christians to grasp

even if you were to prove that there was a first cause, you still havent demonstrated that your God *is* that first cause

oh no no no

<:racun:623428768014270495>

@Deleted User is that it

its late where i am sclep time
ask eoppa ig

o

ok

Cant find the picture of gabe newell holding the Quran, so I'm posting this instead

https://youtu.be/V_z0BojcKZ0

@Riley we discussed this already

i talk to a lot of people. You must refresh my memory

This is when you said you can't do philosophy

yes

<:ChadThunderCock:620468668631089173>

Sorry tranny that doesn't work on you

<:xd:433062903222894593>

got anything empirical

Yes

<:garfilf:606968189640769668>

<:Chad:591182354270257170>

ok lets hear it

I would talk about the Eucharist, but I'll meme and say y'all see motion