I doubt it

( Texas is very pro American but another confederacy would throw that all out the window)

Depends on who the military sides with. Nothing else even matters.

Virginia would go to the union this time

And yeah southern industry is nice

But once northern industrial capabilities are restarted

They are fucked

"If World War III were to occur between NATO and let's say BRICS who would win? Why?"

It doesn't work anymore like this. Such scenario would end life on earth due to nuclear capabilities. That's the reason some scholars claim that nuclear power is all that's keeping us from a WW3.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction

@Orw33 I think it's fair to say that NATO won the Cold War against the Comintern without it resorting to MAD...

NATO won because gorbachev was bored

@Master Yeet the question referred to "World War III", not Cold War, which is arguably still ongoing.

@Orw33 I knew the question referred to WW3, I was pointing out that nuclear weapons don't mean war between nuclear powers would instantly degenerate into MAD

the only states that need to exist for the US is the original 13

@Master Yeet if you think WW3 can happen without nuclear intervention, you're optimistic my friend.

@Orw33 WW3 couldn't be prevented by MAD any more than the Cold War was

@Master Yeet Please read the Wikipedia article I posted:
"In 1949, after the unleashing of nuclear weaponry at the end of WWII, physicist Albert Einstein suggested that any outcome of a possible WWIII would be so dire as to revert mankind back to the Stone Age. When asked by journalist Alfred Werner, what types of weapons Einstein believed World War III might be fought with, Einstein warned, "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones""

Indeed that is a famous quote - what of it?

@Master Yeet My nationalist friend, if you think that WW3 would prove anything other than human ignorance, you're deeply delusional.

Well, I certainly wouldn't *advocate* for WW3, but once again I would point back the the Cold War as an example of a global war between nuclear powers that was undertaken as a rational series of strategic decisions

yea and the only reason because it remained "rational" was because nobdy typed in the launch codes my dude

Indeed

As good a reason as any

@sandwitch Dixie Forever

@Fringes III Jesus was gay

o this is qotd

i thought it was general

lole

@everyone Question Of The Day:

5G networks; the future of Earth or a sign were going down a dark path? Why?

It's not as scawy as chemtrail retards make it out to be that's all

Just faster speeds

I will remain on 3G

If 3G doesn't hurt you neither does 4G or 5G

Just don't buy shitty phones with radiation levels that can kill small animals and you'll be safe

you mean my phone?

If people are so afraid of radiation they wouldn't be tanning themselves for two hours at a time

If people were afraid of radiation they would actually look into the radiaton levels of phones

Which affect you more than le epic Obama Marshall law 5G wireless vaccine brain chemtrail

Niggs 5Ghz wifi *is* equalivant to 5G

And we've had it for a while now

If your wireless wifi has a speed greater than 300mbps you have speeds within 5G range