"Markets are part of the infrastructure —its immanent intelligence — and thus entirely indissociable from the forces of production. It makes no more sense to try to rescue the economy from capital by demarketiz- ation than it does to liberate the proletarian from false consciousness by decortication. In neither case would one be left with anything except a radically dysfunctional wreck, terminally shut-down hardware. Machinic revolution must therefore go in the opposite direction to socialistic regu- lation; pressing towards ever more uninhibited marketization of the pro- cesses that are tearing down the social field, 'still further' with 'the movement of the market, of decoding and deterritorialization' and 'one can never go far enough in the direction of deterritorialization: you
14
haven't seen anything yet'" - Nick Land

Just because you say that doesn’t make it correct. @☭ ⊕ Korovsky ⊕ ☭

Look up the American School. It gave us 200 years of prosperity

Neo Mercantilism built America

@Attika i must have Alzheimer's cause ion remember asking

Not capitalism

Only proto-capitalism has ever been critiqued

We don't need less capitalism, we need more of it

^

<:Chad:591182354270257170>

Deterritorialization is inevitable, capitalism is more than just a mode of production, it's the objectification of the human desire

But just because it’s human desire doesn’t mean it’s good for the society.

Good is a point of view

Sex is a human desire, but there should be societal rules and guidelines for it.

Being a slut is a shame, as it should be.

From the point of view that 'good' is to be interpreted as the 'common good' as opposed to individual good.

Same with homosexuality.

@Attika not anymore

But can the "common good" be objectively described?

It's an opinion

@Maksim *sigh* yeah. Don’t remind me of the collapse of our morals in our societies.

The collapse of old morals is inevitable

A certain policy might be 'good' for a select few individuals, but not for the majority of citizens who have to live with its results.

It's the contradiction of neoliberalism

Old Morals are good.

Our society wants to expand infinitely upon itself without ever changing

They keep the society turning.

It's paradoxical

Old morals are good but they should be implemented into a futurist framework.

The current route our society is going is not good.

Why not?

It’s not sustainable.

As progress continues, society will be swept away by the technological singularity, which will allow humanity to enter its next phase of evolution

So basically we will ascend?

The industrial revolution and its consequences.....

^

The industrial revolution was inevitable

Capitalism is too nationalist/cultural

Really?

@GlobalDelete