From the point of view that 'good' is to be interpreted as the 'common good' as opposed to individual good.

Same with homosexuality.

@Attika not anymore

But can the "common good" be objectively described?

It's an opinion

@Maksim *sigh* yeah. Don’t remind me of the collapse of our morals in our societies.

The collapse of old morals is inevitable

A certain policy might be 'good' for a select few individuals, but not for the majority of citizens who have to live with its results.

It's the contradiction of neoliberalism

Old Morals are good.

Our society wants to expand infinitely upon itself without ever changing

They keep the society turning.

It's paradoxical

Old morals are good but they should be implemented into a futurist framework.

The current route our society is going is not good.

Why not?

It’s not sustainable.

As progress continues, society will be swept away by the technological singularity, which will allow humanity to enter its next phase of evolution

So basically we will ascend?

The industrial revolution and its consequences.....

^

The industrial revolution was inevitable

Capitalism is too nationalist/cultural

Really?

@GlobalDelete

We must abolish capitalism along with the state, and enter a true anprim society

Progress is an unstoppable juggernaut

The state cannot be abolished

^

It can

'Progress' is as subjective as 'good.'

Its sad but traditional ways of life will not win

Anprims are the epitome of idiocy.

And we must also abolish technology

Get off of discord

If we're to believe that there is no such objective thing as 'good', then 'progress' is just as moot a talking point.

It's part of the human security system

Go back to our roots, living in caves

Discord is technology moron.

So what?

@GlobalDelete Then stop using Discord