no, we are defining terms because that is very important

>when you need a definition of what is natural

if we both disagree on a definition of a term, then we won't get anywhere

I had a whole debate on the definition of "truth" with some Christian a while back

like even small things like that are important

so

You’re stoopid, we don’t follow just ‘nature’ because that coukd entail anything. We derive Truth from natural order. Not naturality in of itself.

how do you define "natural"

we are attempting to deconstruct information so that it is meaningless and i can create my own in its place, dont worrry we understand

like that

ok whats the "natural order"

like that is unbelievably ambiguous

Ok fem*id

LOL

it is the hierarchical system of truths that govern our reality

gottem

governs our reality?

Humans are the absolute top

system of truths?

Yes

Bacterium and Microorganisms are the bottom

They’re static

Unchanging

like your defining one ambiguous term with two more ambiguous terms

In terms of influence and power

Read lighting and the sun

Youre just 2 dum my man

idk those bacterium really fucked us up in the past

Yes but we always come on top

do we *always* come on top?

i come on top of women

gottem

if you put a man and a tiger in a room together, who will come out alive?

Depends

lmao

such a reductionist view of strength

wait hold that thought. I need to drive home and shower

got work later

rip

Lol