Message from @Light
Discord ID: 658503687848722475
As for a state, I believe it should be decentralized, though in control of its citizens
A sort of neo-feudalism, though of course, not hereditary
Of course not all Jews have specific traits but most do and they all pose a threat to society as a result
herecy
That explains your opposition to unitary states.
City-states should be the dominant unit, with loose cooperation to form a larger "realm"
or confederation
whatever you want to call it, really
Hell, "Empire" sounds cool, why not go with that? The title is just semantics anyways
so basically individualist anarchofuckery
Words have definitions tho
wrong
Not anarcho
I believe that each city-state should be ruled relatively closely
lolberto individualism
With a larger state apparatus in each city-state, acting independently
@Spergerger autonomous groups are a thing in individualist anarchism but what light wants is fucking gay
Also, the definition doesn't really matter
I more or less support unitary states because they adhere to a consistent, specific set of laws that are applicable to all residents, regardless of deviations. Federalist structures focus too much on specificities and end up producing loopholes in laws that can essentially be manipulated by mal-thinking individuals.
Hello I havenβt been on discord much
Moreover, they can't adapt to changes as well
Likewise, pure democracies cannot adapt to changes/dire circumstances
Authoritarianism + Decentralization enables maximum resilience
Of course on the concept of democracy, have you read Platoβs five governments.
sounds fruity
In his book βThe Republic.β
I haven't
Your roles give me cancer @Spergerger
Ay its Caesar
Plato states that the greatest form of government is an aristocracy; not a hereditary, but based on virtue. Democracy is considered to be one of the worst forms of government that transition to anarchy and then to tyranny.
I believe something akin to that
My beliefs were initially inspired by Dostoevsky
Yes I have been busy with irl stuff @Asdrubal
And I suppose Nietzsche too...
@CaesarKonrad how'd the speech go?
And George Bernard Shaw
Although based on our perceptions on unitary states, we could probably argue all day on the concept.
And weβd end up forming a snake eating its own tail.
Fair enough
Fine though people responded with the same talking point I debunked