Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 606275344487415821
Yes, of which virtually everything is.
Science isn't based around automatically assuming it's the same, and scientific theories aren't crafted in the same way we would generically use the word "theory"
I can't prove intelligent design it's a theory
I'm just looking for you to accept you can't prove evolution
Also, "proof" doesn't really exist in science
There's no such things as proof in science
Then we're both wrong and have no idea how we were created
I don't think you know what that means though
So we can move on now right?
It means that science is based around evidence that builds up and *strongly* supports a theory, not that "This is right, it can never be wrong." That's all it means
Yes
I know
https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/fosrec/Scott1.html
@Deleted User This is sort of a “theories and evolution for dummies” page. You should read it.
But i believe in this particular theory is wrong
I'm not reading shit from UC Berkeley
Why not?
Most retarded school possible
Well aren’t you smart enough to sort the truths from the lies?
Yeah
Then why are you refusing to read it?
Why are you refusing to hear their argument and disprove it?
What are you scared of?
It doesn't need to be disproved
It's already completely retarded
If it has proof backing it, your “disproof” is dismantling their proof,
Also, no insults or ad hominem in a serious discussion.
They have no proof
Then demonstrate that. Show me why the article is bullshit.
Blight and I already agreed there is no proof in science
No no no. There’s no *truth*
Proof and evidence exist. There is no absolute proof nor absolute truth.
You’re misinterpreting what Blight is saying.
I'll tell you why the article is bad
University of political bias
@Deleted User have you ever had a dna test
Waiting for pebble to be unmute
FREE PEBBLE
lmao