```ruby
kek
```

Xi going sicko mode on Hong Kong chimps
https://www.latlmes.com/breaking/chinese-military-massacre-in-hong-kong-1

>latLmes

shh

In Europe the problem is they cause such a problem

From how I understand the us had problems for centuries with minorities

I'm going to shamelessly shill for my new favorite comedian, carl ii

Is there anyone on Earth more talented than carl ii?

>obviously deeply immersed in politically incorrect knowledge
>palpably high IQ
>unlike most nerds, is incredibly ballsy, willing to do things in public that 99.99% of men are too scared to even try
>displays massive creativity in both scripted and spontaneous comedy

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXpuS2AVdBXMu9d8V1YzWSQ/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClf1Wfw54YBjJNlX3NjSOPA

>reviews (((diverse))) NYC food
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0heyBFfoz8

>masterfully larps as a connected jew at porn conventions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eUJoXzwmVY

>humorously engages with crazy jewesses in public
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJnwHtFZ9i0

>confronts Black Hebrew Israelites while larping as a hasidic orthodox jew
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zJ4YdYpr4s

>the best motivational video ever
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdXsCZqoNMQ

and so much more

pls remove shill cancer tbh

Dude this server is called the right cafe

@bar dude capitalism is cringe

All about that Stasserist / National Bolshevik / Juche gang

HK gay

China good

niga

i agree

@Maksim <:Chad:591182354270257170>

Hot takes:

Jews aren't the worst thing on the planet

Communism will never work

Authoritarianism has always led to eventual revolution

Whether our planet is dying or not, we defienetely are and we need to do something against that

China is fucking gay

I haven't seen a single country oppress its people with such disgusting efficiency

China is a threat to Western society and America is an insult to western intellect

@Sven Brender elaborate on how authoritarianism has always led to eventual revolution

and if it is true, is that a result of authoritarianism?

Well. All authoritarian governments have eventually had revolts against them. You can see this throughout history with monarchies and even in modern times with dying monarchies and tyrannical states

it was often half due to the state and half due to its actions

the actions part mainly refers to war

Fanatic authoritarianism like fascism seems ludicrous to me.

It seems quite obvious that democracy functions well

It can lead to degeneracy and decadence, but it seems to serve the Volk much better than an authoritarian system.

I could see a one-party system with a parliament and election of leaders working

basically democracy without parties

I see that you are listed as national socialist, so I provide you a compromise.

If Adolf Hitler had divided power throughout a parliament of sorts, there would have been less tactical, strategic, and political mistakes.

wow! trc chat is not dead!

amazing!

@10mm pistol Wow! You have a double digit IQ!
amazing!

@Sven Brender
The best example, in my opinion, of dictatorship against democracy is Rome, as they did not have foreign nations that could challenge their power, as practically all dictatorships after did. They went from a period of constant infighting for power to centuries of peace and stability, until it would eventually succumb to the burden of immigration and the foreign, desert, non-European religion; Christianity.
In Democracy, there is constantly a fight for power which divides the nation, even if it is a one-party Democracy. A fight for power allows powerful outsiders to aid politicians in pursuit for power in return for political favor, which is exactly what is happening today, and is exactly why we are in the situation we are in. The voters, even if they are just men, are also easily persuaded by their sources of information like media, as that is all they know. This is again something which can be easily employed by powerful outsiders to form a narrative and subvert the people, and not something which can decisively be suppressed as power is divided.
Dictatorships, on the other hand, has one person who is in total control of the nation which is united under him, so that the resources of that nation can be put to the best use. He can take a mature and calm approach to all issues as he does not have to fight for power to make decisions. On the same note he can create stability in the nation, by suppressing subverters or people who seek power, and he can employ the full force of the nation as it is, of course, united and not divided.

Another thing that we have learned from military experiments is; when forces are lead by a committee, they are actually more likely to overreact, and they do not take responsibility. When, in the best case, the committee agrees on what action should be taken, they tended to snowball the situation and others to bandwagon on the ideas. And since there is no one man in charge, the blame can always be shrugged off and responsibility cannot be taken. This is in stark contrast to military research including a single person as leader, who can asses the situation and reason within himself to reach a mature and a more successful decision, and if it fails, he is the sole person to blame. Also, it is quite simply the way humans have evolved, we didn't use to have committees, just a tribal leader.
This is why i think a one-party dictatorship is superior.

I disagree that Hitler did anything wrong, other than the "Halt!" order

@Deleted User oh great

let me guess