@DrRisen theyre oligarchic
not technocratic

So how do you think the system should be reformed in order to get rid of the jewish bankers?

otherwise the head of the epa wouldnt be a climate change denier

So are hierarchies. @Deleted User

false hierarchy of capital not of merit @DrRisen

literally cucking yourself to global capital because youre afraid of change

@Deleted User Similar to how you would wage your revolution. Capture the minds of the populous, but instead use it in a more productive manner.

But youll need alternative media

Which is being supressed atm

lol the naivety of risen

@Deleted User How would you gain popular favor for a revolution against the current system.

literally right where they want him

slurping on the goyfeed

@Deleted User No insults either.

Id need to spread ideas, but I dont need to reach 51 % of the people. Just enough for a state takeover.

A coup is useless without the support of the people.

@DrRisen right so can we agree that political parties are heavily influenced, if not totally beholden, to the donors?

Lots of people are bystanders, even during civil wars @DrRisen

They will go with the flow

and you intend to circumvent this magically whilst working within the system

"Oh I guess they are in charge now"

next joke please!

@Deleted User Semi-influenced. They are more beholden to their voters. Ultimately that’s who they need to pander to.

why do the parties make decisions that go against the voters opinion? @DrRisen

They generally don’t. They simply make concessions to certain factions of the populous as compared to others to gain as much support as possible without entirely losing support of the other larger factions.

most Americans want universal background checks
the party does not deliver, i wonder why?

mos americans want a public option, the party does not deliver

Depends on which party you refer to.

<:NPC:591182668633473024>

different party different donor @DrRisen

Do you have anything to say besides posting memes? @Smönsk

<:HellNo:591182620243525642>

two sides of the same kosher sandwich

Different party different voting faction. Minorities and majorities are not split evenly between issues.

they go against the opinion of their voters

<:ben:588490784576110593>

i wonder why

must be because donors have equal influence with the voters

Then stfu, its annoying @Smönsk

Because the other side is for it, so they must be against it.

<:really:591181753625083905> <:HellNo:591182620243525642>