@DrRisenthry can't even tell you whether light is a Particle or a wave ,they are denying a medium in which it is propagated through

Like, all the interns are somehow bribed to not point out that MIT experiments don’t work?

They work yes and no everyone is not in on it

Science is built on pre assumed or pre determined methodology

But the vast majority are..:

Which is why we are getting lead into a dead end

Dead end?

Is light a wave or a Particle?

Not entirely sure. Do I need to know?

What if there is a medium instead it's travelling through

Would that be totally insane ?

If you can prove it in consistently repeatable experiments I don’t see why that couldn’t be feasible,

Well before einstein and michealson morley botched interferometer experiment we all used to believe in a medium, nearly all famous philosophers and physicists and even inventors like the inventory of wireless telegraphy ,all believe in a medium ,yet science continues to push einsteins nonesense

Dayton miller spent 28 years proving there was a medium, for science to falsely dismissing his findings down to thermal gradients ,aka the shankland report

Michealson morley spent 5 months

And dismissed it

Wrongly

@ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan current theory seems to be working fine for modern scientists. If you disagree you should field your own experiments and prove the world wrong.

No they don't

Sorry but no

It's all theories and workarounds with no actual evidence

I've looked

Then why do so many accept it as valid?

Good question

When it comes to maths etc of globe ,you can just invert it

Distances ,map ,circumnavigation etc

Star trails

All the same

How would you know ?

How do YOU KNOW PERSONALLY? @DrRisen

Please if you have some ,give me some definitive proof

I'm open

I already told you that I don’t. @ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan

That's the problem

No proof

All theories

That can be attributed to other causes

No proof that I personally know, because I haven’t dedicated my life to the study of universal mechanics.

Nor have I

It's not a open shut case

I tried to prove a shape one way or the other ...not so easy