argument/debate

Im not exactly, Nazbol, but eh

close enough

@Maksim Thanks fam

Nazbol to me is an acceptable ideology

It is the same as strasserism essentially

According to your test your a market socialist

on the economic axis of things yes

That's means that your most likely a third positionist

I allow private industry to exist, but if they act in any way against the state or people (like price hikes or artifically limiting stock etc etc) they get their CEOs shot and the company gets nationalized

Far left economics but not full on socialism

tha

that's literally natsoc

and thats exactly what they did

hitler did that

and you act as if he was a massive capitalist?

I would nationalize more than hitler

the only difference is he didnt nationalise as much as you'd like

a lot more

yes

He maybe looking for a more far left economic system than Hitler

Railroad as an example

public transportation

all of it

should be nationalized

hitler built the autobahn

ik

parts of it

most of it afaik

I still oppose Hitler for a plethora of reasons

like

There were many fascist/natsoc homosexuals, Hitler allowed half-jews and at times even 3/4ths jews under his personal allowance to be in the top ranks of the party

A big one is he opposed and hated the slavs

i can agree with the latter being disagreeable

There is a "supposed" quote where Hitler said in his bunker shortly before he killed himself that "the slavs have defeated the german race, they have crushed our nation and ideology, this signifies them an aryan race"

but i cannot find anywhere that this quote is confirmed

that is most likely bullshit

exactly

but i do agree that his hate for slavs was unnecessary

and most likely a justification for german expansionism into the east

Hitler did personally allow for the formation of a Ukrainian SS division so thats strange tho