Message from @Otto
Discord ID: 654489082390380556
so "not all homos"
@DotNerd The higher percentage fuels that concern, so people would naturally be more vigilant.
That’s my two cents.
And that’s absolutely fine.
Sure
thats natural response
You don't have to trust people who are that way, but it doesn't validate preventing the rest.
Though it is valid to prevent other issues, like pedophilia specifically.
@DotNerd General question, not looking to ad hominem. What’s your general ideology?
Would you rather have a child go to a camp where they have a 1% chance of being abused or to a camp where they have a 50% chance of being abused @DotNerd
Elaborate on the ‘humanist’ part.
@Otto well if you want to compare that to adoption, ok, I agree with you there, I wouldn't let a child into a high-risk situation.
Does that specifically pertain to humanistic psychology.
Ah, alright.
ur banned from having a job now
idk, I identify that way because I care deeply about people getting harmed.
Um, it's not quite that way, because I feel like all future parents need to be tested somehow.
Ahhh, alright.
There's a lot of couples that should just not be parents...
Liberals would say that the testers are homophobic
Some radicals might, yep
I think, the most important components would be people that psychologically emphasize a family model and enjoy its prospects are the best parents.
Outrage culture is ridiculous.
That would be a good idea, yeah
and then you would end up with gay testers who only approve gays
wait wait wait wait
lol
we have to test this man
lol
Which man.
wtf is a "israel"
Idk? I don't research Israel.
why ask this ishit
ANSWER
IT