Message from @Enkrum
Discord ID: 654488597155807257
People are not tools.
@DotNerd ok how about this. Would you move in an area with a murder rate of 50% or an area witha murder rate of 1%?
they kinda are
Well, you can spin philosophy to measure individuals as utilities.
in the grand scheme of things the masses act like tools
If you talk about a pedo area @OrthoGoat I would not live there, but there's the other 50% that don't do that, and they're spread out.
Different logistics.
no
idk, some like to say "not all men"
@DotNerd so allow that area to exist because 50% of the people dont rape?
so "not all homos"
@DotNerd The higher percentage fuels that concern, so people would naturally be more vigilant.
That’s my two cents.
And that’s absolutely fine.
Sure
thats natural response
You don't have to trust people who are that way, but it doesn't validate preventing the rest.
Though it is valid to prevent other issues, like pedophilia specifically.
Would you rather have a child go to a camp where they have a 1% chance of being abused or to a camp where they have a 50% chance of being abused @DotNerd
Elaborate on the ‘humanist’ part.
@Otto well if you want to compare that to adoption, ok, I agree with you there, I wouldn't let a child into a high-risk situation.
Does that specifically pertain to humanistic psychology.
Ah, alright.
ur banned from having a job now
idk, I identify that way because I care deeply about people getting harmed.
also you go to jail for discrimination
Um, it's not quite that way, because I feel like all future parents need to be tested somehow.
Ahhh, alright.
There's a lot of couples that should just not be parents...
Liberals would say that the testers are homophobic
Some radicals might, yep
I think, the most important components would be people that psychologically emphasize a family model and enjoy its prospects are the best parents.
Outrage culture is ridiculous.
That would be a good idea, yeah
and then you would end up with gay testers who only approve gays