@DotNerd so allow that area to exist because 50% of the people dont rape?

so "not all homos"

@DotNerd The higher percentage fuels that concern, so people would naturally be more vigilant.

That’s my two cents.

@Enkrum that is correct

And that’s absolutely fine.

Sure

thats natural response

You don't have to trust people who are that way, but it doesn't validate preventing the rest.

Though it is valid to prevent other issues, like pedophilia specifically.

@DotNerd General question, not looking to ad hominem. What’s your general ideology?

Would you rather have a child go to a camp where they have a 1% chance of being abused or to a camp where they have a 50% chance of being abused @DotNerd

@Enkrum Socialist Humanist

Elaborate on the ‘humanist’ part.

@Otto well if you want to compare that to adoption, ok, I agree with you there, I wouldn't let a child into a high-risk situation.

I personally care to protect good people @Enkrum

That is homophobic @DotNerd

Does that specifically pertain to humanistic psychology.

Ah, alright.

ur banned from having a job now

idk, I identify that way because I care deeply about people getting harmed.

also you go to jail for discrimination

Um, it's not quite that way, because I feel like all future parents need to be tested somehow.

Ahhh, alright.

There's a lot of couples that should just not be parents...

Liberals would say that the testers are homophobic

Some radicals might, yep

I think, the most important components would be people that psychologically emphasize a family model and enjoy its prospects are the best parents.

Outrage culture is ridiculous.

That would be a good idea, yeah

and then you would end up with gay testers who only approve gays

wait wait wait wait

lol

we have to test this man

lol

Which man.

@DotNerd What is your opinion on the israeli nuclear program?

wtf is a "israel"

Idk? I don't research Israel.

why ask this ishit

ANSWER