idk what thats supposed to prove tbh
its shows nothing of hitlers actions

other than that germany was successful as a result
assuming those are real

i dont see how easier profits mean less workers rights or anything of that sort

the first graph shows the share of national income that went to capital in Germany between 29 and 41

seems to be abit of correlation/=causation

not really

but since you want to talk about workers rights, even though I was talking about protecting capital

Nazis were great for the economy

Epic

oh so you were being deliberately slippery

hitler liquidated many labor unions and labor leaders and replaced them with a government regulated labor union

capitalism is what i meant by capital

yeah... so did I. That's why it's called capitalism after all

And the share of national income that went to capital grew under the Nazis

So

Idk what else you'd call that

Except protecting capital

Corporatism

well yes
but so did the soviets effectively
you werent allowed to go against the state lol

yeah and that's another problem I have with the soviets as a socialist industrial unionist

Labor organization was organized by the state mostly

BASED

How does criticizing the soviets make me a tankie again? Lol

so as i expected not really anything there tbh

Or a larper

Or whatever

thats for the guy that called you a tankie to say

Just because I recognize that I share more in common with a socialist than a Nazi

not in the case of the soviets

youre reasoning was that you werent equally aligned because hitler protected capitalism and was funded by wealthy people

you dont have any evidence for the former except
more profit being made
and the later applies to the soviets as well so?

yeh kinda strange
but but but..
i rescind my accusation of larper
you were just misinformed

no. you said that the Nazis were pursuing an alternative to capital and because of that I was aligned to both. I was just saying that was bullshit lol

how does more profit being made = more capitalism
when the soviet union industrialised it had greater returns on capital
did it get more capitalist???

was the tzar a socialist

trying to save his country from evil capitalist backed communocapitalists?

absolute nonsense

I mean, Hitler's economy was capitalist, but he wasn't a capitalist. What I mean is basically the Third Reich's economy was capitalist but this was just cause Hitler hadn't finished all the economic reforms he would've done.

i think that the increase on returns is easily explained by tech advancements and longer working hours due to war probably