not quite

i think having central authority can be good if it's done right

but i do highly think that even in a centralized system that decentralized subsystems are highly beneficial

>centralised
>but decentralised

wut

read what i said again

a centralized system can have decentralized components

How can it be centralised if the components that make it aint centralised

because those decentralized components are subordinate to the central authority

they are implemented within the substrate of the centralized authority

then it isnt decentralised when there is still a clear centralised leader

clearly a centralized system can have decentralized components though. a system that is centralized just expresses that there is a central seat of authority, it has nothing to do with the actual constituent members of the system.

When I say a centralized system though u don't mean a government i mean more like a republic based around a document that establishes basic human rights

and all the decentralized systems subordinate to it are unrelated but derive from that base ideology and structure

but obviously centralized systems can accommodate decentralized ones

cryptocurrency is practical proof

the economy is a highly centralized system but even within it it can still contain decentralized economic systems such as cryptocurrency formed by groups of people who build something on top of the central system

it's like virtualisation

building an emulation or version of a thing on top of that thing

the thing about reality is, the things we view as dichotomous and in opposition to each other generally really aren't; those distinctions are just arbitrary things we've created since our brains are built to make binary decisions

but reality itself isn't binary; it isn't 0 or 1, it's both and everything in between

@oz stop spamming the chat please.

2nd jaydeemhmm

@Deleted User

<:GWcorbinTopKek:384871333705678868>

@oz decentralised centrilism is what made the USA how it is

And that didn't really turn out too great

Jej

Take the education system there fx.

Everything is privatly owned

Meaning that in order to achieve anything you already have to be a rich jew

So no, combining contralism with decentralism does not work in practice

What does work however is having decentralised alternatives to the already government funded central solution

But keeping them separate is a bad idea in practice unless they were already decentralised to begin with, like the marked

So in conclution having a central system is needed in order to have a functioning society

That strives for bigger and better things

Denmark is an amazing example of centralism done right

Every emgerancy system is government funded and what isn't government funded (private markets) are cheap

Hi

@steakhim where da fuck are you?

He’s in a strip club