Message from @oz
Discord ID: 478930025412952075
which is why I word it as hacking the human machine
and as far as anonmafia goes I don't actively do anything there except provide strategic advice
@oz what type of spooky advice
oh im just a general advisor you know. if there's something that the lead guy needs clarification or a second opinion on he comes to me
i would personally rather be an advisor than ever a person truly in a seat of power
the reasons should be obvious why I think :3
@oz are you one of those anarchist fags? jej
not quite
i think having central authority can be good if it's done right
but i do highly think that even in a centralized system that decentralized subsystems are highly beneficial
>centralised
>but decentralised
wut
read what i said again
a centralized system can have decentralized components
How can it be centralised if the components that make it aint centralised
because those decentralized components are subordinate to the central authority
they are implemented within the substrate of the centralized authority
then it isnt decentralised when there is still a clear centralised leader
clearly a centralized system can have decentralized components though. a system that is centralized just expresses that there is a central seat of authority, it has nothing to do with the actual constituent members of the system.
When I say a centralized system though u don't mean a government i mean more like a republic based around a document that establishes basic human rights
and all the decentralized systems subordinate to it are unrelated but derive from that base ideology and structure
but obviously centralized systems can accommodate decentralized ones
cryptocurrency is practical proof
the economy is a highly centralized system but even within it it can still contain decentralized economic systems such as cryptocurrency formed by groups of people who build something on top of the central system
it's like virtualisation
building an emulation or version of a thing on top of that thing
the thing about reality is, the things we view as dichotomous and in opposition to each other generally really aren't; those distinctions are just arbitrary things we've created since our brains are built to make binary decisions
but reality itself isn't binary; it isn't 0 or 1, it's both and everything in between
2nd jaydeemhmm
<:GWcorbinTopKek:384871333705678868>
And that didn't really turn out too great
Jej
Take the education system there fx.
Everything is privatly owned
Meaning that in order to achieve anything you already have to be a rich jew
So no, combining contralism with decentralism does not work in practice
What does work however is having decentralised alternatives to the already government funded central solution
But keeping them separate is a bad idea in practice unless they were already decentralised to begin with, like the marked