Message from @πΏπππππππππππ π²πππππππππ
Discord ID: 523934763321393202
More Unitary or more Federal?
A grand leader on top whose charisma is enough to move the tribe forward, and whose actions are wise and powerful enough to grant the tribe prosperity
Monarchy is somewhat of a perversion of this because the clerical class got power away from the leader
That wasn't the question( I mean any fascist would prefer a Grand Leader), I mean, Large Scale Civilizations or Small Scale Civilizations?
Well, both. I believe that the tribe should keep expanding and destroy and slightly absorb all of the enemies it finds. It's the biological destiny of the chosen dna
Also how much self-governance of the States in the country, like the USA(different Laws but overall follow the Bill of Rights), more freedom than USA(Something akin a alliance of diferent States), less freedom than USA etc?
It may depend on the times. Assuming that one is born, there will be a lot of war before a proper peace
Descentralização ou Centralização de Poder, acho que assim da pra entender melhor
The word of the great leader always prevails, and it's important to maintain discipline, but there's limit to autism. You can't micromanage every aspect of every city in your kingdom. So as centralized as possible and acceptable.
I type slowly because I like to rephrase (and won't accept making a mistake)
?addrank Grammar Nazi
Grammatik Macht Frei
While I understand that we can't micromanage every aspect of every city, I would like to be as micromanaged as possible and centralized as possible, so basically Cameras in every corner of the country
Well you already are <:30yoboomer:521380551316209668>
But grammar nazism aside, indeed, a hard hierarchy is necessary.
one of the greater autisms of the Left is the obsession of removing hierarchy
Oi Bearer, based on your results in Politcscales I assume you aren't as industrial as most people right?
Sorry, a bird entered through my window.
It's more about compromises, I'm not willing to substitute the natural for the artificial, nor to increase production, because I'm interested in lowering the number of people in the world, not increasing it.
But, if pressed by war, I will not put the survival of others over my own tribe.
(There is, of course, a balance to be found between compromising the present and dooming the future)
But, talking in utopian terms, I would prefer a synthesis between Industry and Nature
A synthesis?
You mean an environment friendly industrial society?
Well, we're talking in Utopia terms, so imagine a Sci-Fi RPG where the robots and shit have organic material(mostly plant) in them
ok no lol. No abominable intelligence here.
But an Environment Friendly Industrial Society is the most likely ideal
You have to use "an" before words that start with vowel sounds, which are most words that start with a vowel, except for U ones
Thank you Grammar Nazi
<:redpill:520001018348437524>
Yes, it's ideal. Also, kiwis are Primtegralists.
Getting Grammarpilled right now
Primtegralist is short for Primitive Integralism?
Yes
I prefer Primitive Transhumanism myself
But it's just a way to say ecointegralism without sounding lame
and using the anprim meme
>Transhumanism
Every human must ascend and go beyong human nature to realize that we should go back to be hunter-gatherers
Γbermenschen are not trannies ok
They could be, but we all now Catgirls are the true Γbermenschen