Message from @πΏπππππππππππ π²πππππππππ
Discord ID: 523927654907248660
Oi @Bearer Of The Curse , they're having a discussion on the Holodomor in general that's been going for hours, so I ask here, what do you think of Vargas? True Nationalist? The Big Gay? or something inbetween?
Is that the Brazilian guy?
Or is it someone else
Yeah, was the Brazilian leader from 1930-1945 and then gained the election by popular vote in 1951 then killed himself in office some time later
He supported the Nazis and the Fascists until supposedly the Germans began attacking some Brazilian merchants ships, then joined the Allies in the War
Oh cool
He even send a Jewish woman to Hitler as a present
Did they actually attack Brazilian ships or was that a false flag thing?
Really, I don't know, some say it was USA doing(a possible theory) but still, Brazil entered World War I(yes, we were in WW1, we send about 300 soldiers that destroyed a U-Boat and got the Spanish Influenzia or the Flu, don't remember) because Germans destroyed Brazil merchants ships too, so I don't know
Same thing as Integralism, there's too much rotten information and it's hard to find anything. afaik he had part in the minimum wage and halted the growth of Integralism, so I'd say big gay yet enough of a fatherly figure to be remembered. Somewhat of a Churchill maybe?
Bem, pelo que sei, ele Γ© ligado ao movimento Castilhista, assim como Populismo, aΓ tem o argumento se ele era de Esquerda ou de Direita, mas isso Γ© os retardados
Overall I think of him as a Nationalist that helped indutrialize Brazil, though couldn't manage the opposition
Yeah, he's both good and bad, things could have been better without him, but he did leave a mark in Brazilian history in favour of nationalism
What type of Nationalist are you? I think you said your meme ideology was irmapill or something like that?
lol no, that's Irma's
I'm an ecofascist, and my meme ideology is Primtegralism. Basically I'm in favour of the natural succession of the tribal system, and fascism is what most closely resembles it.
a true conservative
tribal system do you mean on a economic sense or a organizational sense?
Organizational
A grand leader on top whose charisma is enough to move the tribe forward, and whose actions are wise and powerful enough to grant the tribe prosperity
Monarchy is somewhat of a perversion of this because the clerical class got power away from the leader
That wasn't the question( I mean any fascist would prefer a Grand Leader), I mean, Large Scale Civilizations or Small Scale Civilizations?
Well, both. I believe that the tribe should keep expanding and destroy and slightly absorb all of the enemies it finds. It's the biological destiny of the chosen dna
Also how much self-governance of the States in the country, like the USA(different Laws but overall follow the Bill of Rights), more freedom than USA(Something akin a alliance of diferent States), less freedom than USA etc?
It may depend on the times. Assuming that one is born, there will be a lot of war before a proper peace
Descentralização ou Centralização de Poder, acho que assim da pra entender melhor
The word of the great leader always prevails, and it's important to maintain discipline, but there's limit to autism. You can't micromanage every aspect of every city in your kingdom. So as centralized as possible and acceptable.
I type slowly because I like to rephrase (and won't accept making a mistake)
?addrank Grammar Nazi
Grammatik Macht Frei
While I understand that we can't micromanage every aspect of every city, I would like to be as micromanaged as possible and centralized as possible, so basically Cameras in every corner of the country
Well you already are <:30yoboomer:521380551316209668>
But grammar nazism aside, indeed, a hard hierarchy is necessary.
one of the greater autisms of the Left is the obsession of removing hierarchy
Oi Bearer, based on your results in Politcscales I assume you aren't as industrial as most people right?
Sorry, a bird entered through my window.
It's more about compromises, I'm not willing to substitute the natural for the artificial, nor to increase production, because I'm interested in lowering the number of people in the world, not increasing it.
But, if pressed by war, I will not put the survival of others over my own tribe.
(There is, of course, a balance to be found between compromising the present and dooming the future)
I imagined a Bear trying to chase away a bird