Message from @ZaibatsuBLKN
Discord ID: 545637196011667466
the 13 years of english classes
wouldnt do shit
id rather learn CHAD
BIBLICAL LANGUAGES
hahahahaha
the virgin kraut surrender and border hopper
THE CHAD LATIN ARAMAIC SYRIAC GREEK ETC
dont even care if i have to learn whole new alphabets
^
same but not
degeneration
***Love***
***BUT MUH LOVE***
>hair that looks like some ice cream flavor
>tattoos
remember, sexual revolution was a mistake
Degenerate self gratification = love
Punished why are you black now? You were red some time ago
Have a good pdf about the sexual revolution, too bad I'm on phone
>I am not a homosexual, I only suck my friend's digit every Saturday.
i like how you don't address the rest of my statement
>The only reason Churchill got into power was because the previous PM failed with his Hilter appeasement policy.
sure. he was still controlled by jewish financiers
>US wasn't in the war until Hilter's ally rekt them.
of course. though the US forced japan's hand so they can go to war. (((the powers that be))) in the US wanted the US to go to war.
>Hilter broke Molotov-Ribbentrop pact with USSR first.
sure, but stalin was going to attack hitler anyways, so hitler went with first blood so russia couldn't build up their defenses and cut off the oil supply etc
to think that russia wouldn't have conquested europe is foolish
@Kazimir Malevich
You first asked "Why did everyone ganged up on Hilter?"
When I give you valid reasons for why this happened you go "Sure, but [irrelevant point]"
they aren't irrelevant at all
i also asked the question rhetorically but thats fine
The fact that Churchill was supposedly supported by the Jews does not remove the fact that UK was anything but hostile towards Hilter until he began conquering Europe.
The fact that Stalin was a threat does not remove the fact that Hilter attacked his ally, unprovoked, first, and got royally rekt.
You are moving the goalposts on the question of "Why did these ebil allies teamed up to destroy Saint Hilter" and I am not too happy about that.
You asked the question rhetorically because you foolishly thought the obvious answer will support your belief. It didn't.
how did i move the goal posts
answering with the most obvious kosher approved narrative answer is a cop out
if you gave me a better answer than cold kosher takes then i might agree with you
lol "let me post a meme simplifying a complex situation and set it up as a straw man, that'll surely own the stormfag"
Calling answers you disagree with "kosher" is not a substitute for a coherent argument.
no, i'm just saying going with the whole mustache man bad muh holocaust narrative is a cop out
Not even mentioned the Holocaust (save the meme, but I used it as a generalization of my points that didn't involve the Holocaust).
At the very least, ethics aside, mustache man stupid.
ok.
we can all agree hitler made mistakes
i think we can also all agree that the anglos and the US are evil lol
That is, at the very best, a silly and thoughtless way to put it.
At the very worst, it is disingenuous.
how lol
i'm talking generally, throughout history