National self-sufficiency

And why is it bad?

Well

yeah what is bad about being self sufficient

I think that nations should be whole to exchange resources

isn't that better than depending on others

You can exchange resources and still be independent

So places don’t have things they need and they need to import

So you're a capitalist

No

But I’m an internationalist

You want need so you can sell, this is capitalism 101

Why is internationalism making single countries weaker? They can reinforce each other without being stuck together

I suppose

I think resources need to be exchanged still

Sometimes a nation can’t fair on its own

Having the bare minimum to sustain your own people does not disqualify you from helping others, and rather it gives more individual countries the autonomy to help that single country on their own

I don’t think that’s autarky

Having the bare minimum is good

Your issue is with closed economies. But why do you want economies to be forced to share with others, rather than have virtuous peoples that want to share on their own?

They can do that

I support the DPRK

So what's your point against autarky?

I was under the assumption it was a closed economy

So if a nation produces the bare minimum of what it needs thats fine

Hell they can do more

Let them decide

Oh well. Some people here may want to discuss with you about ethnostates but there are many ways of viewing it and many endgame objectives by it, so the discussion might grow more than it should

@big coat what are your views on race

I’m afraid to answer that

@big coat why

I think that race doesn’t really matter

he think black peepl are stupid gay

And that class is the only meaningful division in society

why not both

join nazbollah today

@big coat what about regression to the mean and recessive genes

Because class is based on material economic conditions

@HisNameisBrentonTarrant what?

also why is material success / money the end all be all