again, i'm talking extreme situations with hefty evidence

wit some jordans and a spear

if you weren't filmed molesting a kid, this doesn't apply to you

because if you were you wouldnt be so eager to derp around about death row and 100% centainty

yeah, I also didnt break any traffic rules

there're a whole lot of assumptions in that statement

but what to you know, I was found 100% guilty

and i didn't say people should fucking die for breaking traffic laws LOL

we had cameras, we had withnesses

and again, i wouldn't apply current standards

bullshit

it would

it will for somebody

i wouldn't? hypothetical again

@SadSushiRoll 'pat pat'

?

the court system is broken as fuck as it stands

Why the sudden pats

i said this before

humans are fallible and corruptable

okay so give me justification

for raping a 5-year-old and not dying

we kill 99 child rapist-murdurers

and 1 innocent

that's not what i asked

total 100

ok good night kids im heckin tired

i'm not addressing the current standards

the issue is that youcan be accused of something, but be innocent...that is the issue.

yes, which is why i'm not saying

the current stanards? what the fuck does that even mean?

let courts decide as they stand today

stop changing subjects

i, uh

i'm literally on the same subject

you told me to answer "why should a child rapist live"

and you said

"we kill 99 child rapist-murdurers
and 1 innocent"

my answer: because some people would be found wrongfully guilty and an innocent will die while the rapist if free

oh man dude

@Sarcastro that point is actually a good one