Maybe you don't. That's your freedom to feel that way. Lol

Well speaking of biological success, I think group dynamics, social norms, and civilizations have their own Darwinian survival of the fittest

why does anyone

Because the opposite of that is enslavement. When has that ever been a good thing?

Civilizations have been creating dysgenic populations since their inception

primivitism>civilization in terms of genetics

The orders which persist are one's that constrain degeneracy, dysfunction, and the excesses of female nature

Again Fury, you are just appealing to some abstraction. Give me something tanglible

They impose rules on the populace, kill rule breakers, and deter future rule breaking. This has a eugenic effect

Letting inferior people live is not eugenic. That is what cities do

agriculture is dysgenic

^

I'm not sure your understanding. Do you desire to be happy and healthy @allhailthebowl?

I don't even say this as a larper

It's materialistic Fury

I desire more than that

Well, man is not an island. The first rule of biological success is adaptation to the enviornment. Humans adapted to live in groups

Freedom is materialistic?

in the buddhist sense maybe

Or it's just some abstract comfort if you like that wording better. Nothing about that means its worthy of anything

A group of humans that specializes a class of farmers who farm food to feed soldiers who conquer other tribes, crush them, and steal their land/food is infinitely superior to one lone human who has better eyesight or something

What definition of freedom?

What does freedom achieve

rule of law doesn't exist

rule of law is only enforced via a monopoly on violence in a geographical area

and you can arbitrarily change it

if you lose to someone else it also changes

Freedom is not supposed to achieve anything on its own. It is supposed to allow people to decide what they achieve individually.

much like the social contract it doesn't exist

Society is a human adaptation for survival and it's why humans rule the world

freedoms ensured by the state are not freedoms at all but temporary privileges

Perhaps.

There are certain freedoms we just expected in certain cultures

that generally weren't taken

like english common law

I think you mean rights

until it was

Well, it depends on your definition of freedom

Freedoms and rights overlap

depends if you wanna go thick libertarianism or thin libertarianism definition of freedom or death cult buddhism freedom

It's talking about the same core liberal beliefs