tbh i think no matter who you guys would get you'd always consider them "another trump" because what you expect is unrealistic and doesnt deliver the results you'd intend

I hate when people say that kind of shit

what that you need to be realistic? im sure you do

you think you know what everyone's thinking

listening to people does give you that ability

holy shit

lmao

mind = blown

its almost like people *say* what they *think*

crono

what am i

thinking of

apparently this
```honestly tucker will probs just end up as another Trump
another person who seems like the man who will save america
but then cucks into the netherrealm
a blue 2020 is inevitable at this point
trump solved nothing
what we need to do is to make sure we get
the deepest blue possible```

wrong

it is

watermelon

its watermelon

oh shit

<:ohno:520006095125872641>

honestly accelerationism in the "lets vote someone in we hate so that people will react to it" is retarded, literally cutting off your nose to spite your face

especially since theres no reason why the pendulum won't swing back as soon as you get your candidate in as people hate your policies just as much

im more along the lines of

speeding up collapse

chaoschaos

again, thats pretty retarded

blowing your house up and killing yourself will also speed up collapse incrementally

why dont you light yourself on fire to rek the libturds?

how is making your country shitter any different?

beyond that its not just yourself who you're affecting and you dont bear the brunt of it, so your kinda just an entitled asshole

i just want something different at this point, too depressed

then do something constructive because wrecking shit and then moping in the corner is a vicious circle because then your gonna want to wreck more shit because you feel weepy that all your shits wrecked

like honestly no hate but this is the logic of a 2 year old on a temper tantrum

Welcome, @deep sea arab! 😃

In my personal view, accelerationism aims at decreasing the peoples' standard of living so bad so that the only way to change the system, revolution, is possible. A problem with this, however, is that due to checks and balances on the president the country will not get to the accelerationist level of instability.

If you get Harambe's dead corpse elected to accelerate things it'll just be controlled by presidential aides and the senate to ensure the country doesn't collapse.

@Kazimir Malevich lets take that at face value, is it a bad thing that a country doesn't collapse overnight? Wouldn't it be considered a good thing that in any country with a bureaucracy there is a floor on how bad things can get while that country remains able to exert itself in order to do so?

in my view revolutions, by which I mean violent insurrections, often create a recurring cycle of poverty in that these movements destroy the infrastructure, institutions and capital that supports the established hierarchy, true, but also supports the wellbeing of the nation as a whole. This causes further unhappiness as the new regime is expected to produce a higher standard with a lower base of productivity to support that. Likely this will result in another revolution, further lowering the standard of living that country can support. This is without examining the effect of development and governance, sovereignty, etc