dont

maybe photoshop some "anti fury" t shifts on the victims

(don't do it, it's just a joke)

Technically not the shooter

paerl harbor

eh, I like the meme none the less

That kid is a little shit tho

of course, and the importance of that meme presentation is the necessity of not being nice

something it seems the testosterone-less youth fails at

Guys we can't get mad about both of these things it's illegal.

I'm shaking and crying right now how can people feel sympathetic towards victims of a mass shooting.

Theyre muslims i wont shed a tear

Don't exactly care whether you care or not m8.

But when you go out of your way to make other people not care you are a brainless homosexual.

@Kazimir Malevich

Or it’s for the fact that one gets disproportionate amount of media and political attention than the other.

Especially when the former was designed to be bait for said media and political attention.

One is a terrorist attack, another are singular murders.

Murder with an religious/political agenda.

A.k.a. Terrorism.

Are you going to say the Pulse nightclub or Nice attacks had little coverage?
It largely depends on the type of crime committed and number of people killed whether it'll get political attention.

It was barely covered, with the added agenda of trying to paint the terrorist as an “lone wolf” or “mentally damaged”

Not something that they did with Breivik.

I don't know which news sources you ingest, but both of the attacks I mentioned were highly covered.
Both Breivik and the NZ prick wrote manifestos which easily tied them to certain ideological train of thought.

I'm not saying the Muslims didn't make it clear what ideology they killed for, but 87 pages is a bit more than shouting "Allah Akbar", at least for the media.

Both Pulse and Nice had an manifesto of their own if you add the Quran as a manifesto.

Since that’s where they get their ideological train of thought.

Not to mention the immediate damage control the establishment commits when the perpetrator is Muslim.

That the people wrote and that is directly tied to them*

#notall

Immediate restriction of speech.

You yourself would probably find it annoying if some fedora tipper said that Bible was Coventry Garden terrorist's manifesto.

I wouldn’t if said terrorist actually did cite the bible for his actions.

Then we have very differeng interpretations of the word "manifesto".

We don’t.

The thing with Islamists is that they don’t need to write an actual manifesto

When they have the Quran as inspiration.

If you want to say the censorship of speech is bad, I agree conpletely. Why you need to somehow imply that "there's these other issues, now stop caring about this one" is beyond me.