Hmm, so you're saying he might not even need to morph an existing image so long as the likeness of Keemstars duaghter was used?

seems so, yeah

@Deleted User Insofar as she can be proven to be a model. All precedent I'm aware of says that a real kid being involved means child porn, hence why Free Speech Coalition never challenged C. However, this is conditional upon the prosecution, Keemstar in this case, to prove that in court, which leads me to ask you this question.

How did you find out this was the case?

More importantly: Child porn is gay. And being gay is unacceptable.

@Deleted User Find out what was the case exactly?

That Shad used Keemstar's kid as a model, since that sparked this conversation.

I'm trying to establish if Shad outright said this or if this was just rumor or something.

Well I can send you the image in question as it's not sexually explicit. In fact, outside of the girl in the picture have what could be seen as a lewd face the image is not sexual in nature.

He had a slightly more lewd depiction of Lt. Corbis (renamed Lt. Whorebitch)

I only care if the material was pornographic in nature and if Shad had admitted to using Keemstar's daughter as a model. It may or may not pass obscenity law, I can't give a general prescription, but I'm wondering how you drew the conclusion that Keemstar's daughter was the inspiration.

The image depicts Keemstar holding her

although the image is of the kind where there are 3 shots in one

so its one of her being held and 2 of just her

one shot has her standing fully clothed with a possibly lewd face

the other is her eating popcorn and reciting Keemstars "lets get right into the news"

its an obvious parody

mind you the image possibly couldve been her giving head to trump

but shadman seemingly backed down from that

OK then, it looks like he's got innocent until proven guilty working in his favor then. I was thinking he sent out communications or subtitled it saying that or something, which would have been a massive red flag. It sounds like it wasn't going on into clear porn territory, and Shad knew enough to not clearly take it there, so the worst he'll face involves some obscure obscenity law not worth prosecuting.

He may be subject to potential damages later down the line, but that is depending entirely on whether there are damages to speak of.

theres only a disclaimer at the bottom stating the usual all persons depicted are ficticious but im not sure what thats worth

Depends on how the judge feels at the time TBH.

They're the guys responsible for calling whether this is transparent covering of the ass or genuine.

Go Fuck Yourself, 00 ! You Cunt.

???

oh well

Lol the only reason I came to this chat was because I got a discord notification that said go fuck yourself 00 ! You Cunt 😅

HAHAHAHAHAHAAH! WHAT A WONDFERFUL WAY TO COME BACK TO! 8D

Trini, I’m getting Blue to finish up the art.

Alright.

I need to give up on alcohol altogether...

Why would you start to begin with?

Depression. But regardless, it causes me to create such witchcraft as this.

And yes, that is me and Tots fused together.

I call it: Migger Koks

How dare you manipulate the image of the dead for your own commercial gain.

She won't remain dead long.

I've gathered the remains of Tots and plan to resurrect her using meme magic.

This won't create an angry mob style of revolt similar to Young Frankenstein.

Probably not. There's only bones left now, so we need to turn to Satanic magic in order to successfully preform the ritual.