Message from @Krelin
Discord ID: 484410457881575425
Like I said, he walked right up to the line on that one, nobody's gonna dispute that, but did he actually cross it?
That's I'm not so sure.
Hey guys, seeing as Kraut's video got flagged down, I'm going to go ahead and mirror it on my channel, merely for the sake of fairness in the face of this mob-censorship.
Inb4 channel is also flagged.
If that happens, it's yet another victory for those on the side of free speech.
New development: Kraut’s channel is now gone. Presumably flagged right off the Internet by his ideological opponents.
This either means that
A: Krautphobia is in full-swing.
or
B: They are legitimately trying to hide something.
(Probably a mix of both)
Everything's getting flagged
Jesus
I always forget that people take the internet so seriously.
Also,
>inb4 kraut flagged his own channel down to get sympathy from everyone and is still going on 24 hour ops lol
That's legitimately the opposing argument
....
Jesus fuck...
Oh and I guess because Metokur was flagged off YT at around the same time, Kraut is responsible because of course he is.
He was suspect number 3 on his list.
Yeah I know. It's either him, Mundane Matt or the furries.
Considering the vitriolic behaviour of the the SJW-furry community, I wouldn't be surprised if it was the latter.
#FurriesGaveMeFleas
Update: Irate Bear's mirror of Kraut's video has not only been flagged, but has also received a legal complaint.
What
Fuck?
he's streaming about it right now
🆙 | **far right yorkshireman leveled up!**
he hasn't gotten a strike, but the video is restricted
Wouldn't surprise me if it gets taken down by tonight.
i hope not.
If so, I already sent Irate the link to my mirror of the video.
that's good
bear's been getting shit from people for it
they call him a fence sitter for not getting involved, but if he did then they'd moan that he's doing it for attention
Or moan that he's taking a side.
I'm starting to lean more towards Kraut in this whole ordeal.
You try and make sure that someone's point of view is represented as fairly as possible, and the next thing you know you get hounded for it.
And that's why I'm starting to lean
You think that audio interview he had with that New York times writer might be the reason for this?
Wdym? That it will come out that the basis for it was purely scientific?
i agree with you messiah. i don't like him as a person and don't trust him, but i'm starting to believe that he isn't the doxxer he was made out to be
Oh I can confirm he himself never doxxed anyone. The question anymore is as to whether he knowingly allowed for the doxxing aspects of his server.
i'm still on the fence about that. i still think it's plausible though
Here's what we know thus far: