Nobody cares about your outdated ideas

just eat more like your ancestors it sounds a lot easier and healthier

wouldnt it be better in the long run tho

REEE CURRENT YEAR

okay retard

1 cow replacing 10

Lab grown meat will be better in the long run

or just 5

Considering it will be essentially clones

<:FeelsKek:379422423206068245> imagine being that delusional

imagine thinking you need to eat meat all the time

okay boomer

I don't wtf

lmfao

kill yourself

okay boomer

kathrine you're actually low functioning

hit a nerve on you didnt it

sad

"the patty cost more than $300,000 to produce and was overly dry"

<:FeelsKek:379422423206068245> it's the future

Okay then riddle me this, if they perfect this, and it is virtually identical to meat you would get from a cow, what's the problem? Saying it costs less to produce them via lab given time.

Yeah?

It's in it's infancy

This isnt shit that happens immediately you dumbfuck lol

virtually identical as in nutrient content and process is about the same?

The aim is to mimick the taste and nutrients, yes.

not to mention price

yes then I'd eat it

Okay, and I already mentioned that

"It takes more than 2,400 gallons of water to produce just 1 pound of meat. Only 25 gallons of water are required to grow 1 pound of wheat. You can save more water by not eating a pound of meat than you can by not showering for six months" "Nearly 60% of the world's agricultural land is used for beef production, yet beef accounts for less than 2% of the calories that are consumed throughout the world. Beef makes up 24% of the world's meat consumption, yet requires 30 million square kilometres of land to produce."

that's a big IF

That's all I was saying

we can all quote shit

I think it's very possible

I dont expect it in the next 5 years or anything

>wheat
>not grass

kathrine you're literally arguing something I don't care for

you're actually retarded boomer

@Farunel I don't think anything can really replace actual animals

I think we can