Message from @Kathrine
Discord ID: 639399436593922058
lol okay traditionalist
its one cow instead of 10
Nobody cares about your outdated ideas
just eat more like your ancestors it sounds a lot easier and healthier
wouldnt it be better in the long run tho
REEE CURRENT YEAR
okay retard
1 cow replacing 10
Lab grown meat will be better in the long run
or just 5
Considering it will be essentially clones
<:FeelsKek:379422423206068245> imagine being that delusional
imagine thinking you need to eat meat all the time
okay boomer
I don't wtf
lmfao
kill yourself
okay boomer
kathrine you're actually low functioning
hit a nerve on you didnt it
"the patty cost more than $300,000 to produce and was overly dry"
<:FeelsKek:379422423206068245> it's the future
Okay then riddle me this, if they perfect this, and it is virtually identical to meat you would get from a cow, what's the problem? Saying it costs less to produce them via lab given time.
Yeah?
It's in it's infancy
This isnt shit that happens immediately you dumbfuck lol
virtually identical as in nutrient content and process is about the same?
The aim is to mimick the taste and nutrients, yes.
not to mention price
yes then I'd eat it
Okay, and I already mentioned that
"It takes more than 2,400 gallons of water to produce just 1 pound of meat. Only 25 gallons of water are required to grow 1 pound of wheat. You can save more water by not eating a pound of meat than you can by not showering for six months" "Nearly 60% of the world's agricultural land is used for beef production, yet beef accounts for less than 2% of the calories that are consumed throughout the world. Beef makes up 24% of the world's meat consumption, yet requires 30 million square kilometres of land to produce."
that's a big IF
That's all I was saying
we can all quote shit
I think it's very possible
I dont expect it in the next 5 years or anything
>wheat
>not grass
kathrine you're literally arguing something I don't care for
you're actually retarded boomer