I just don't see a samurai winning in most cases, 12th century sure, they aren't played at all, late 13th and beyond, I see zero chance of them winning against a highly armored and most of the time, highly trained knight.

the armors are enough to justify a win for the knights

Not really

Unless you're talking about the HIGHEST quality steel armor, which not all knights had access too, that samurai has a chance to win.

If we are talking blunt weapons it's more in their favor.

@Stone Cold Steve Autism are you still up tf

@Oskar Don't @ me horsefucker

Most knights had access to the best by the way.

Not all of them lmao

retard

MOST

@Stone Cold Steve Autism

It depended on the house, and how much money they had.

A lot of higher tier knights had that shit yeah

@Oskar

uh oh

But if we're talking basic bitch knight, no. They had somewhat decent armor.

how is it i went to sleep and all the people in here last night are still here

no

knights are rich nobles

It's almost like people live in different parts of the world or something

:O

would that not be true of most "basic bitch" samurai

Imagine that

You weren't really a basic bitch knight either, most have trained their entire lives for it.

<:urfookinded:632121331260850186>

I need to stop re-watching certain shows. God damn it.

Re-watching trailer park boys

<:5Head:577634982265094165>

Nah.

I'm re-watching Fate Zero.

..But only because of Iskandar.

But back to the point, unless the samurai has something blunt, he'd come in for the slice, maybe might get the armpit, that's usually got chainmail protecting it, he's fucked unless he is god tier.

Samurai's armour was made out of fucking bamboo

your argument is irrelevant

the armor itself is enough to give the knight a winning advantage

Moreover

Yeah, but the weapons a knight has is overkill.

Most samurai weren't fighters

they had fucking desk jobs

*vast* majority