Idk man, even africans should be allowed to have ethnostates

Maybe closer to home but in a place that far off?

Kinda a hard sell.

Imperialism interfers with the principle of preserving each culture, ethnos

^

Inevitably there would be race mixing

Also multicultural elements would have to be put in place

The only imperialism I remotely support is the USA with north and South America

Unless you want either ethnic riots

Or try to commit genocide

Can't just take africa and shake it in a bag together with Britain

You cant easily force people to change and adapt to a culture without leeway

God knows what terrible things would come out

If you kill all the native there'd be little race mixing and no mutli culturalism

Like you would have to give at least an inch to prevent total riots and by that point it kinda beats the purpose of nationalism if you have to accept bits of other cultures to precent collapsing.

Yeah have fun trying to kill that many people and not get eventually coalitioned by the entirety of the continent

Like thats alot of ground AND alot of people.

Plus the British colonial era had very little race mixing or mutli culturalism and they were more moderate.

The African continent wouldn't unite until it was too late. Because I wouldn't be genociding africans only a specific ethnic group of africans.

And unless the entire rest of the world is either apathetic or just as nationalistic how would you make sure someone wouldnt invade you at the same time due to the amount of resources you would have to spend?

And please dont say you wouldnt cause its fucking africa.

A nation's entire army wouldn't be needed to conquer one African country.

HMMMM

That really varies from country to country

Is this just one part of africa or the whole damn continent? Because I could of swore this was implying continental size

Also ^

The East African militaries are definitely better than the Central African militaries for one

I.e. Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, etc.

Bur central africa also has shit tons of just either plains or raw jungle which would have to be processed

There's also a shit-ton of cheap Soviet surplus concentrated especially there

Either that or you would have to face against places like sudan who all they know are fighting and would most likely team up against foreign invaders

Not to mention the Sudanese now have the extensive support of the Arab League since their recent coup

Coastline would be easier but considering the stability of africa whats not to say other coastal nations then attack you to try to get more resources as they see the invaded country as weak now

The problem with many African militaries is that they're primarily intended to be domestic policing forces

True.

And the ones that arent are usually in a constant state of fighting warlords. But that goes back to the eariler point

This isn't the case for the North or East African militaries who are very capable of projecting power beyond their borders

Which countries lol

Execpt liyba rip that place

The only ones I can think of off the top of my head are the Congo and Somalia and those are being wrapped up

True I guess Im thinking of the 70-80