reactionaries are the boomers to the third position

it's an analogy, poopoo head

yeah retard

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HX8ljqgNH10

Well done @Puppet Master, you just advanced to level 3!

evolution is false and possibly the most destructive idea to society. fossils can just as easily be made by a global flood as they could be made by the current nonsense they claim they are made by. (dinosaur falls in swamp somehow gets covered in mud lots of pressure ect) there is also no evidence evolution can happen and it has never been observed or tested.I know many will argue on this point but let me continue.
the whole idea that gender does not exist and is a social construct can not exist without the theory of evolution. the idea that morality itself is relative is a product of evolution. many of the ideas the sjw left has are based on evolution. one of if not the most corrupting idea in society.

.....those are results of modernism, not evolution as a whole.

Evolution has been shown through darwin's studies

Find better ways to explain the machinations of god and his wonderful handiwork

only something as brilliant as evolution could've been designed by Him

This is your daily reminder that creationism is crackpot bullshit with nothing but "YEAH, BUT IS IT **ACTUALLY** THAT WAY" to back up its thoughts

bruh shut the fuck up (((Creationist)))

^

Also, how the fuck did evolution lead to moral relativism

you're just pulling shit out your ass

never even mentioned creationsim

nice try though

if everything evolved from a slime then morality itself is something that also evolved.

you would have to actually prove evolution is true.

not a creationist you fucking retard i agree with nikola tesla on these things

you people are retarded if you argument is literally "wah creationism"

explain to me how gender is not a social construct if you believe in evolution. evolution makes it clear gender only exists for the purpose of reproduction/survival. you could theoretically find a species that has no gender or 3 genders.

Humans have two genders. Animals are not the same as humans.

To say an animal has more than two genders is not violating this fact of nature, for animal nature is different than human nature.

What is fundamental for us is not for them.

humans can evolve to have more genders though right?

But we are not at that point.

but you agree that we could evolve to have more genders right?

mammalian physiology for the time being does not accommodate multiple genders

so long as mammals exist

they cannot have multiple genders

we could socially construct our society a different way in order to get women to evolve to be more like men right? yay feminism

What we evolve into in several million years to have multiple genders won't even be recognizable as human

or mammalian for that matter

it is not human

therefore, humans cannot have more than two genders

fact is according to your world view gender does not exist outside human beings and human beings are a product of their environment.

When did I say gender doesn't exist outside of humans

stop projecting and come up with an actual argument

still waiting on the proof that evolution exists, got any?

i did, just because you can not effectively argue against it does not make it invalid